Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TheCosmicKid" data-source="post: 7243102" data-attributes="member: 6683613">Looking really good. You parallel a lot of my own thoughts on what a revised ranger should look like. I just have two quibbles:Firstly, all rangers getting an animal companion is not a direction that WotC is likely to take, based on the design decisions they've already made in 5E. You may have noticed that other forms of companion which were at one time core features, such as the paladin's mount and the wizard's familiar, have also become optional. I believe the reason for this is that, while some players really enjoy this feature, for others having to keep track of a whole extra character is more of a hassle than it's worth.Secondly, the PHB ranger is bad enough, but you give your ranger a third save proficiency and it's still not Constitution?</blockquote>