Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 1505625" data-attributes="member: 478">The above is a way to have the sorcerer keep up with the XPH psion, which I think it achieves.You probably agree with me then, that the XPH psion is just too good... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />I just made it to resemble the psions flexibility somewhat. I'm quite aware how powerful this ability is.What kind of limits would be ok? Full-round action was something I thought about. Making it a metamagic feat (and thus having all spellcasters access to this ability). Anything else?Hey, at least a way to make that ring of wizardry useful! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Hmm... I think that is in UA already.Yeah, and regular maximize is also better then (unless you can't do it yet, but then the slots are too valuable still), or a rod of metamagic.Well, I'm assuming (which I don't agree with, BTW), that psion and wizard are equal in power.Most people on this board say, that the spontaneous casting of the sorcerer (and psion likewise) is not as powerful as WotC thinks it is. Well, it's certainly hard to compare with the unlimited spell access the wizard has.Yep, that is something that would work, too, but I wanted to stay as close as possible to the original sorcerer.I like familiars and it really fits to the sorcerer. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />ByeThaneeP.S. Maybe you should look into my other approach to balance psion and sorcerer... the re-revised psion.</blockquote>

Verification