Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
RE: Tarasque vs. 5th lv. Wizard scenario - how does Wizard know to use Acid Splash?!?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elderbrain" data-source="post: 6503649"><p>15 minutes presumes prior knowledge of how many h.p. it has, which might not be the "mere" 600+ you expect. As I mentioned before, it could legitimately, by-the-book have 900+ h.p.</p><p></p><p>With regards to the Tarasque not having the ability to throw objects listed in its stat block, that's because it is an implicit, improvised action which the rules allow ANYONE with appropriate limbs to take. Listing every damn thing a creature could do in its stat block would needlessly eat up page after page of the Monster Manual, just to fend off people who make arguments of this sort. Arguing that the Tarasque can't throw rocks because it's not listed in its stat block is like a DM arguing that your PC can't breathe because nowhere on your Character sheet does it specify that you can. Any monster or PC can take any action that would be physically plausible given that creature's anatomy and ability scores (i.e. a Pixie couldn't throw a huge rock, because it's not strong enough, not because rock throwing isn't listed in the Pixie stat block.)</p><p></p><p>Now, can the tarasque throw that rock AS WELL as a giant could? Probably not, since giants specialize in that kind of attack and for them it's not an improvised action. How well the Tarasque throws the rock depends on its Dexterity score. So it might not hit the Wizard right away, but it certainly can try!</p><p></p><p>Maybe the next Monster Manual need to have a page right at the front that says, in bold letters:</p><p></p><p>"ATTENTION RULES LAWYERS! ALL MONSTERS IN THIS BOOK POSSESS THE ABILITY TO TAKE INPROVISED ACTIONS NOT LISTED IN THEIR STAT BLOCKS. THE ABILITIES PROVIDED IN THE STAT BLOCKS REPRESENT TYPICAL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE CREATURES, NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LISTING OF EVERYTHING THE CREATURES CAN DO. HAVING THE MONSTER DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT IS 100% LEGAL AND LEGITIMATE PROVIDED THE ACTION IS WITHIN THE CREATURE'S PHYSICAL CAPACITY."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elderbrain, post: 6503649"] 15 minutes presumes prior knowledge of how many h.p. it has, which might not be the "mere" 600+ you expect. As I mentioned before, it could legitimately, by-the-book have 900+ h.p. With regards to the Tarasque not having the ability to throw objects listed in its stat block, that's because it is an implicit, improvised action which the rules allow ANYONE with appropriate limbs to take. Listing every damn thing a creature could do in its stat block would needlessly eat up page after page of the Monster Manual, just to fend off people who make arguments of this sort. Arguing that the Tarasque can't throw rocks because it's not listed in its stat block is like a DM arguing that your PC can't breathe because nowhere on your Character sheet does it specify that you can. Any monster or PC can take any action that would be physically plausible given that creature's anatomy and ability scores (i.e. a Pixie couldn't throw a huge rock, because it's not strong enough, not because rock throwing isn't listed in the Pixie stat block.) Now, can the tarasque throw that rock AS WELL as a giant could? Probably not, since giants specialize in that kind of attack and for them it's not an improvised action. How well the Tarasque throws the rock depends on its Dexterity score. So it might not hit the Wizard right away, but it certainly can try! Maybe the next Monster Manual need to have a page right at the front that says, in bold letters: "ATTENTION RULES LAWYERS! ALL MONSTERS IN THIS BOOK POSSESS THE ABILITY TO TAKE INPROVISED ACTIONS NOT LISTED IN THEIR STAT BLOCKS. THE ABILITIES PROVIDED IN THE STAT BLOCKS REPRESENT TYPICAL ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE CREATURES, NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LISTING OF EVERYTHING THE CREATURES CAN DO. HAVING THE MONSTER DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT IS 100% LEGAL AND LEGITIMATE PROVIDED THE ACTION IS WITHIN THE CREATURE'S PHYSICAL CAPACITY." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
RE: Tarasque vs. 5th lv. Wizard scenario - how does Wizard know to use Acid Splash?!?
Top