Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Reach
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="phindar" data-source="post: 3365098" data-attributes="member: 37198"><p>This is weird, because I've been thinking about the centaur too (though I haven't been sufficiently motivated to post on it). I came down on the other side of it, though, the centaur is really considered a Medium creature with a Large body. Its a man-sized torso with man-sized arms, so it shouldn't really be able to wield an ogre-sized club or a Large longbow (which would be 10-12' tall). Being a Large long creature is kind of like that; you've got the mass of a large creature, but not the Reach. </p><p></p><p>By the logic of the game rules, a man wields a polearm that's about twice his height, and gets 5' of Reach from it. An ogre wields a polearm twice his height, and gets 10' of Reach from it. The centaur should wield (as Large, by the book) the ogre's 20' polearm, get 5' of Reach from it, and get no Reach from the Medium 10' polearm, which is appropriately sized for it's upper body. (The centaur is one creature that facing would help out on. In terms of threatening, it would be like a mount with a rider in the front hex rather than the rear.) </p><p></p><p>Anyway, this is going the long way round to say that the centaur is really a poor example when it comes to weapon size and reach, because from the waist up, its just a normal guy. The only thing I can say about centaurs is that they should get double damage on a charge with a lance. (If anybody gets it, centaurs should.) </p><p></p><p>Here's my argument for weapons giving the Reach of a creature of that size category:</p><p></p><p>A Medium creature is about 5' tall, and threatens within 5'. A Reach weapon of his size will be 10' long, and allow him to threaten the square 5' away. </p><p></p><p>A Large creature is about 10' tall, and threatens within 10'. A Reach weapon on his size will be 20', an allow him to threaten squares within 15-20', but not within 10'. </p><p></p><p>A Medium creature who takes the feat Monkey Grip can now use the ogre's 20' polearm, it makes sense to me that he would have more Reach than if he was wielding a polearm half that size. Thats the logic side of it. From a game balance standpoint, this makes the feat Monkey Grip more attractive, and while I don't think Monkey Grip is useless without the Reach, I've never seen a player actually take it so it could probably use the incentive. </p><p></p><p>If a centaur wants to wield a Large Polearm, he should take Monkey Grip. (He could call it Horse Grip if it made him feel better.) Otherwise, his man-sized arms and man-sized chest will have to make do with a man-sized weapon (and his man-sized appetite will have to make do with a Manwich, and maybe a side of hay).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="phindar, post: 3365098, member: 37198"] This is weird, because I've been thinking about the centaur too (though I haven't been sufficiently motivated to post on it). I came down on the other side of it, though, the centaur is really considered a Medium creature with a Large body. Its a man-sized torso with man-sized arms, so it shouldn't really be able to wield an ogre-sized club or a Large longbow (which would be 10-12' tall). Being a Large long creature is kind of like that; you've got the mass of a large creature, but not the Reach. By the logic of the game rules, a man wields a polearm that's about twice his height, and gets 5' of Reach from it. An ogre wields a polearm twice his height, and gets 10' of Reach from it. The centaur should wield (as Large, by the book) the ogre's 20' polearm, get 5' of Reach from it, and get no Reach from the Medium 10' polearm, which is appropriately sized for it's upper body. (The centaur is one creature that facing would help out on. In terms of threatening, it would be like a mount with a rider in the front hex rather than the rear.) Anyway, this is going the long way round to say that the centaur is really a poor example when it comes to weapon size and reach, because from the waist up, its just a normal guy. The only thing I can say about centaurs is that they should get double damage on a charge with a lance. (If anybody gets it, centaurs should.) Here's my argument for weapons giving the Reach of a creature of that size category: A Medium creature is about 5' tall, and threatens within 5'. A Reach weapon of his size will be 10' long, and allow him to threaten the square 5' away. A Large creature is about 10' tall, and threatens within 10'. A Reach weapon on his size will be 20', an allow him to threaten squares within 15-20', but not within 10'. A Medium creature who takes the feat Monkey Grip can now use the ogre's 20' polearm, it makes sense to me that he would have more Reach than if he was wielding a polearm half that size. Thats the logic side of it. From a game balance standpoint, this makes the feat Monkey Grip more attractive, and while I don't think Monkey Grip is useless without the Reach, I've never seen a player actually take it so it could probably use the incentive. If a centaur wants to wield a Large Polearm, he should take Monkey Grip. (He could call it Horse Grip if it made him feel better.) Otherwise, his man-sized arms and man-sized chest will have to make do with a man-sized weapon (and his man-sized appetite will have to make do with a Manwich, and maybe a side of hay). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Reach
Top