Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Read aloud text in modules: What are folks opinions about read aloud content?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 9635534" data-attributes="member: 20323"><p>Boxed text has many points of potential failure that lead to that "checking out" [USER=1]@Morrus[/USER] and other folks mentioned. For example, boxed text can...</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Assume mode of travel / directionality of PC travel that may be false (e.g. "to your left is a golden archway surrounding impenetrable darkness, to your right is a barred wooden door"...wait we used passwall to come in through the floor!)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Boxed text may focus attention on something players don't care about (e.g. description of an armoire which is a concealed door...when really that is "stage 2" info that should be offered only once a player expresses interest in the armoire).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It may overstay its welcome (e.g. insisting each room receive same level of description when that's not necessary or just being a wall of text)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It may leave critical information til the end ("....and there are also 3 ogres") as a sort of add-on that's not integrated into room description, or worse comes after meandering text and players' attention is flagging so they miss important detail or miss mention of monsters.</li> </ul><p></p><p>I think boxed text can work wonders – but that requires effectively prioritizing information delivered, needs of the GM as intermediary between adventure & players, an understanding of clues/foreshadowing, and walking that line between "just the facts" & artistic emotionally evocative description without becoming boring or unclear.</p><p></p><p>That takes effort: understanding the encounter & iteration on the writing.</p><p></p><p>Because of thin profit margins on most published adventures, this is why in the OSR you often see "bullet point" descriptions of rooms. It's harder to mess up bullet points intended for the GM to put into their own words. The one drawback is that this offloads some burden onto the GM's shoulders to figure out how to communicate certain things (info priority & clues/foreshadowing in particular), without giving the GM guidance/teaching on how to do that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 9635534, member: 20323"] Boxed text has many points of potential failure that lead to that "checking out" [USER=1]@Morrus[/USER] and other folks mentioned. For example, boxed text can... [LIST] [*]Assume mode of travel / directionality of PC travel that may be false (e.g. "to your left is a golden archway surrounding impenetrable darkness, to your right is a barred wooden door"...wait we used passwall to come in through the floor!) [*]Boxed text may focus attention on something players don't care about (e.g. description of an armoire which is a concealed door...when really that is "stage 2" info that should be offered only once a player expresses interest in the armoire). [*]It may overstay its welcome (e.g. insisting each room receive same level of description when that's not necessary or just being a wall of text) [*]It may leave critical information til the end ("....and there are also 3 ogres") as a sort of add-on that's not integrated into room description, or worse comes after meandering text and players' attention is flagging so they miss important detail or miss mention of monsters. [/LIST] I think boxed text can work wonders – but that requires effectively prioritizing information delivered, needs of the GM as intermediary between adventure & players, an understanding of clues/foreshadowing, and walking that line between "just the facts" & artistic emotionally evocative description without becoming boring or unclear. That takes effort: understanding the encounter & iteration on the writing. Because of thin profit margins on most published adventures, this is why in the OSR you often see "bullet point" descriptions of rooms. It's harder to mess up bullet points intended for the GM to put into their own words. The one drawback is that this offloads some burden onto the GM's shoulders to figure out how to communicate certain things (info priority & clues/foreshadowing in particular), without giving the GM guidance/teaching on how to do that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Read aloud text in modules: What are folks opinions about read aloud content?
Top