Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Nemesis Destiny" data-source="post: 6102386" data-attributes="member: 98255">Mostly? Because I think the current version is awful. Are we still talking about skills?As for the Warlord, it should be included in the standard rules because it's a core PHB class from an edition of the game. One that many players are fond of. It was a stated aim. If they're revising that aim, they should come out and say it.I find your binary categorizing of people in your third bullet to be grossly narrow. There are far more than two kinds of people as it regards their opinion on the issue. You're missing the people who go beyond "don't mind" and who want it included just as badly as those people who don't want to see it. By that rationale, every class should be a DM option. Oh, wait. They already are, and pretty much always have been.I want to run a campaign with no Divine magic (Dark Sun) so no clerics, paladins, or similar. Done.I want to run a game with no magic, so no Wizards, no magical Bards, and no Sorcerers or Warlocks. Done. I want to run a game with a gritty Swords & Sorcery feel, so no inspirational healing from Warlords and Bards. Done.I arbitrarily don't like class X, Y, and Z, so they're not usable at my table. Done.</blockquote>