Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Readied Actions and Timing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ControlFreak" data-source="post: 135389" data-attributes="member: 899"><p>Man, was tonight's game a mess! Anyway .. let me get past my lousy mood to ask a question that came up LOUDLY in the session:</p><p></p><p>PC Fighter: Initiative Bonus +6, Current Initiative 22</p><p>Monster: Initiative Bonus +4, Current Initiative 10</p><p></p><p>(Round 1)</p><p>Monster has readied action: if anyone shows their head around that corner I'm going to shoot them with my bow.</p><p></p><p>(Round 2)</p><p>PC Fighter leans around the corner to take an arrow shot</p><p>Monster shoots with readied action</p><p>PC Shoots and pulls back behind the corner</p><p></p><p>Here's the question:</p><p></p><p>According to the rules, the monster's initiative now matches the PC's initiative of 22. When 2 creatures have the same initiative, the bonus determines who goes first.</p><p></p><p>Does this mean that the PC will ALWAYS go before the monster? It seems to me that the new initiative of monster would be slightly before the PC. The monster would then be able to ready an action each round. Otherwise, it's impossible for someone to maintain an "overwatch" on someone with a higher initiative bonus ... ever!</p><p></p><p>What I ruled, was that regardless of bonuses, the monster (in this case) would go before that PC in the next round and be able to ready another action before the PC acted. It didn't make sense for the monster to only be able to attack the PC every other time he peeked out just because of that bonus.</p><p></p><p>(realize that the same thing could have easily occured the opposite way if the PC had the lower bonus and was trying to overwatch snipe)</p><p></p><p>Anyway .. I would like to know what people think.</p><p></p><p>Thanks,</p><p>ControlFreak</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ControlFreak, post: 135389, member: 899"] Man, was tonight's game a mess! Anyway .. let me get past my lousy mood to ask a question that came up LOUDLY in the session: PC Fighter: Initiative Bonus +6, Current Initiative 22 Monster: Initiative Bonus +4, Current Initiative 10 (Round 1) Monster has readied action: if anyone shows their head around that corner I'm going to shoot them with my bow. (Round 2) PC Fighter leans around the corner to take an arrow shot Monster shoots with readied action PC Shoots and pulls back behind the corner Here's the question: According to the rules, the monster's initiative now matches the PC's initiative of 22. When 2 creatures have the same initiative, the bonus determines who goes first. Does this mean that the PC will ALWAYS go before the monster? It seems to me that the new initiative of monster would be slightly before the PC. The monster would then be able to ready an action each round. Otherwise, it's impossible for someone to maintain an "overwatch" on someone with a higher initiative bonus ... ever! What I ruled, was that regardless of bonuses, the monster (in this case) would go before that PC in the next round and be able to ready another action before the PC acted. It didn't make sense for the monster to only be able to attack the PC every other time he peeked out just because of that bonus. (realize that the same thing could have easily occured the opposite way if the PC had the lower bonus and was trying to overwatch snipe) Anyway .. I would like to know what people think. Thanks, ControlFreak [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Readied Actions and Timing
Top