Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sunseeker" data-source="post: 6279525">4: This is how I would rule most situations.As a general response: M charges T.  T moves.  If T charges M, I'd give them both an extra +2 to attacks and damage because ya know, the two two oncoming trains and twice the speed/impact thing.  It could be quite the scene, always a good chance to up the ante!  If T moves, M can alter their route within reason.  A charge is a high-speed action (hence the extra movement squares) and thus the ability to make course corrections is limited (like turning at warp for all you Star Trek nerds).  If T shifts only a single square left of right, then I would require him to declare his shift not when M declares their action, but when M is 2 squares or less away.  If T makes a full move, I'd say M must be double the distance of T's move in order to still hit him.So if T moves 4 squares the exact moment that M declares their charge, M can still adjust provided they are the maximum normal distance away (6 normal move +2 extra for charge).  If M is 7 of fewer squares away, they cannot adjust enough to still hit T, unless T moves less than 4 squares.  6 for 3.  4 for 2, 2 for 1.  Basically, M cannot adjust their course more than a 45 degree angle, which even then is pretty sharp.I realize that explanation is a little math intensive, but that's how I would rule it.On another note, this is all assuming a charge from something in front of T must end in a square in front of T.  M could move through adjacent squares, provoking OAs, but not getting to hit with their charge.</blockquote>

Verification