Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Enrahim2" data-source="post: 8886208" data-attributes="member: 7039850">There are already some threads discussing the release of claimed full text version of the OGL-1.1. Those I have seen have so far focused on discussing the validity of the document, and continued speculating around the consequences. These are fine discussions, but I wanted to make a thread for trying to make a more deep dive into the legal formulations that we now have. What I am curious about is things like if there are some non-obvious meanings or pitfalls that might not be obvious to the lay person; if there are things that might seem weird but is indeed quite common; or if there are anything that seem unusual/nonsensical (preferably beyond the already much discussed &quot;no longer an authorized version&quot;I am not a lawyer, but I still have some thoughts that I hope to share soon, but want to get this thread started in case others also are burning to talk about this angle of the new developments.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Enrahim2, post: 8886208, member: 7039850"] There are already some threads discussing the release of claimed full text version of the OGL-1.1. Those I have seen have so far focused on discussing the validity of the document, and continued speculating around the consequences. These are fine discussions, but I wanted to make a thread for trying to make a more deep dive into the legal formulations that we now have. What I am curious about is things like if there are some non-obvious meanings or pitfalls that might not be obvious to the lay person; if there are things that might seem weird but is indeed quite common; or if there are anything that seem unusual/nonsensical (preferably beyond the already much discussed "no longer an authorized version" I am not a lawyer, but I still have some thoughts that I hope to share soon, but want to get this thread started in case others also are burning to talk about this angle of the new developments. [/QUOTE]

Verification