Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Reading Ravenloft the setting
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 8230542" data-attributes="member: 6915329"><p>Which for <em>Darklords </em>is fine, because they're supposed to be villains.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So why not give it to the female Darklords?</p><p></p><p>It's appallingly sexist to make them all have the stereotype of "must have a man and/or baby," so why not give them a different stereotype? After all, they're arch villains; it's OK for them to be cliché, so have them be <em>different </em>types of cliché. </p><p></p><p></p><p>And we're not talking about constructive desires. We're talking about how female Darklords are limited to "is evil because she can't have a man" or "hates all men, therefore is evil." </p><p></p><p>A male Darklord whose <em>only </em>motivation is "evil because he can't get a woman" would be incredibly boring, which is why they gave Dominic--who was evil long before he was old enough to realize that girls were all nice and pretty and stuff--a country that he actively manipulates, an archfoe with the same shtick he's trying to outmaneuver, and a political day job he actually performs <em>in addition </em>to falling in love easily. </p><p></p><p>A male Darklord whose <em>only </em>motivation is "hates all women, therefore is evil," would be incredibly boring and probably would be written out of canon quickly. In fact, Duke Gundar, who was basically an evil vampire whose entire shtick was that he forced people to pay an exorbitant tax every time a baby girl was born, <em>was </em>killed off in the Grand Conjunction. (Ish; he became a skeleton, regrew his flesh, and apparently now wanders the land as a bestial, amnesiac vampire.)</p><p></p><p>It should be noted that, canonically, now that Gabrielle has Matton in her life, "she is less jealous of the happiness of others and no longer takes as much pleasure in toying with innocent folk." Once she got a man, she stopped being so awful. See what I mean?</p><p></p><p></p><p>What it needs to become less sexist is to give the female Darklords another motivation beyond one revolving around men or babies. </p><p></p><p>There are lots of domains that are pure fantasy, not based on any 19th-century novel: Keening, Vechor, G'Henna, Sithicus, Staunton Bluffs. And more if you allow for domains that are based around real-life events but not Gothic tropes: Falkonia, Tepest, Nidala, Souragne, Borca. You may or may not like them as domains, but it's proof that they were never limited to old novels.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What's sad is that you would have the entire setting die rather than just give a little bit of thought as to how female Darklords could be a bit more interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 8230542, member: 6915329"] Which for [I]Darklords [/I]is fine, because they're supposed to be villains. So why not give it to the female Darklords? It's appallingly sexist to make them all have the stereotype of "must have a man and/or baby," so why not give them a different stereotype? After all, they're arch villains; it's OK for them to be cliché, so have them be [I]different [/I]types of cliché. And we're not talking about constructive desires. We're talking about how female Darklords are limited to "is evil because she can't have a man" or "hates all men, therefore is evil." A male Darklord whose [I]only [/I]motivation is "evil because he can't get a woman" would be incredibly boring, which is why they gave Dominic--who was evil long before he was old enough to realize that girls were all nice and pretty and stuff--a country that he actively manipulates, an archfoe with the same shtick he's trying to outmaneuver, and a political day job he actually performs [I]in addition [/I]to falling in love easily. A male Darklord whose [I]only [/I]motivation is "hates all women, therefore is evil," would be incredibly boring and probably would be written out of canon quickly. In fact, Duke Gundar, who was basically an evil vampire whose entire shtick was that he forced people to pay an exorbitant tax every time a baby girl was born, [I]was [/I]killed off in the Grand Conjunction. (Ish; he became a skeleton, regrew his flesh, and apparently now wanders the land as a bestial, amnesiac vampire.) It should be noted that, canonically, now that Gabrielle has Matton in her life, "she is less jealous of the happiness of others and no longer takes as much pleasure in toying with innocent folk." Once she got a man, she stopped being so awful. See what I mean? What it needs to become less sexist is to give the female Darklords another motivation beyond one revolving around men or babies. There are lots of domains that are pure fantasy, not based on any 19th-century novel: Keening, Vechor, G'Henna, Sithicus, Staunton Bluffs. And more if you allow for domains that are based around real-life events but not Gothic tropes: Falkonia, Tepest, Nidala, Souragne, Borca. You may or may not like them as domains, but it's proof that they were never limited to old novels. What's sad is that you would have the entire setting die rather than just give a little bit of thought as to how female Darklords could be a bit more interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Reading Ravenloft the setting
Top