Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Bedrockgames" data-source="post: 8232320" data-attributes="member: 85555"><p>It doesn't mean that there isn't problematic content, but it certainly should be weighed when reading the characters. And I am not so sure about your conclusions. The tone of the argument I am seeing seems to be not only is the book bad, but the people who made it were either bad or not good designers because they had women who had love as a motive (and that people who like it, or don't see it as bad in the way the critics here do, are bad themselves: and you can see that in language use in response to our posts). My argument is that stuff doesn't make it bad design. And I question the conclusions people are drawing about how problematic it is. I am trying to defend the works of writers who are just being affixed with a criticisim and narrative I think it is lazy. Not arguing these things are perfect or don't have problems. No work is free of problems. But I am arguing against the simplistic caricature of the work.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Bedrockgames, post: 8232320, member: 85555"] It doesn't mean that there isn't problematic content, but it certainly should be weighed when reading the characters. And I am not so sure about your conclusions. The tone of the argument I am seeing seems to be not only is the book bad, but the people who made it were either bad or not good designers because they had women who had love as a motive (and that people who like it, or don't see it as bad in the way the critics here do, are bad themselves: and you can see that in language use in response to our posts). My argument is that stuff doesn't make it bad design. And I question the conclusions people are drawing about how problematic it is. I am trying to defend the works of writers who are just being affixed with a criticisim and narrative I think it is lazy. Not arguing these things are perfect or don't have problems. No work is free of problems. But I am arguing against the simplistic caricature of the work. [/QUOTE]

Verification