Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Bauglir" data-source="post: 1523756" data-attributes="member: 6982">While I'm all for scaling weapons, I think that different sized versions of a given weapon should come under different proficiencies, and may well even be a different category of weapon.  ie.  A large sized light mace could not be used effectively with a light mace weapon proficiency, much as how a greatsword cannot be used effectively with a shortsword proficiency.The large sized mace doing 2d6/x2 is borderline imo.  It's either a slightly weak martial weapon (compared to the greatsword; the greatclub is imo very poor, and should be classed a simple weapon) or a strong simple weapon.I think the most elegant solution would be to make the greatclub a simple weapon, and add the 'Greatmace' as a martial weapon in its place.Of course the more of this kind of thing you do, the further you move away from RAW 3.0 weapons, but I guess that's what I like about the system - modifying it to suit your needs is very easy, much more so than with the 3.5e system.</blockquote>