Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fenris-77" data-source="post: 8010764" data-attributes="member: 6993955">I'd probably still disagree about the nature of maps vis a vis railroading and player goals, at least in the abstract. A map can be a railroad, for sure, but that's down to map design. The maps that are probably index a preference on the part of the designer to limit options and the force the action in particular ways. Obviously I missed you general thesis that it's mostly a matter of can and not will, to which I wholeheartedly agree.As far as NPCs goes, I also agree with the above, but I think the example your using, of bakers and baked goods, is perhaps somewhat trivial as far as railroading goes. If the NPC is abstemious then that is a pretty significant part of their character. That doesn't make them not gracious though, so it wouldn't have to affect the player necessarily. It's also the case that a hundred different gifts might do in that case, and the fact that one linked to a PC won't in that case doesn't really register for me as railroading. Not because of the character or choices particularly, but because it doesn't make sense to me that the whole game world is full of people who love muffins just because one of the PCs is a baker. Don't get me wrong, I agree with the spirit of what you're saying, and it's possibly nitpicky of me to engage with the specific example.If I'm reading what you mean as NPC-as-puzzle correctly, which I think broadly means that the NPC has one handle and it's the job of the PCs to figure out what it is, then I'd agree that it's a poor way to inculcate vibrant social interact. That's not really a character though, it's a cardboard cutout. I don't approach NPC design or play that way at all.That's mostly on purpose. I find that examples of actual play tend to sidetrack conversations. If I had one that fit a convo perfectly I'd use it, but mostly it feels like trying to fit the evidence to the thesis for me. Also, my memory for the fine details of play is poor for the most part, at least as far as being able to recount them as blow by blow recaps. I envy your ability to summon up that level of detail seemingly at will.I think there's something pretty interesting to be unpacked here. When you say you use them to support fictional framing, I feel like I agree with you, as in that's what I use them for. However, if you asked me what well framed fiction was specifically good for, I'd probably say to aid in adjudicating actions. The two ideas seem pretty closely linked to me. There must be some nuance there that I'm missing in order for you to present those a two quite different processes. One difficulty, for me at least, is that NPCs and physical spaces don't play the same way, or at least I don't use them the same way. I don't usually bother with physical maps for anything smaller than a real dungeon, and even then, I don't really see the connections of the physical space as something that limits player choice in a negative way. I mean obviously it does limit choice, when there are only two corridors you have only two choices, but that seems trivially obvious. Maybe it's because I don't have room contents in the way that a published module does that I'm struggling here. My 'dungeons' tend to have sorts of inhabitants, and sorts of possible treasure, and there may be some loosely strung together encounters, but those aren't tied to rooms. The idea that X is waiting in room Y has never made any sense to me, as it makes the place enormously static rather than responsive to the players actions. As soon as the players hit a dungeon, the inhabitants are in motion, and where the players might encounter X, Y or Z, has everything to do with their choices and nothing to do with the map. My maps are just a tool to keep me colouring inside the lines when it comes to obeying the laws of physics, really.As for NPCs, what I actually do in play varies a little. I will have notes of some kind for important NPCs, but in other cases I don't. In the latter case the fiction guides my responses and thus adjudication. So lets say the players encounter a guardsman of some kind. If I don't have notes, his responses and personality are going to be defined by what a 'usual' exemplar of that role would be in the fiction. A poorly paid guardsman snoozing next to a dilapidated warehouse door is one thing, and the highly trained and motivated guards outside the kings bedchamber are something else. In each case I don't have anything predetermined about responses, I just react to whatever the PCs decide to do as an approach in a way that makes sense for the role of that NPC. That is modified in each case by any success or failure states from PC actions that might apply going in (a failed stealth check, a successful performance check for a disguise - stuff that sometimes gets rolled for before engaging with an NPC). I don't ask for SI rolls to start, I ask for declarations. There, the answer to what do you do?  sets the parameters for how the actions unfolds. My description prior to that question usually contains some information that the players can use to guide their actions - the guard seems nervous, or the clerk seems busy and annoyed. If I have notes, those also often have some drives or personality traits that I'll use to frame an ongoing interaction when they matter. My first hurdle for social interaction is usually about objections. If the PCs are asking for something and there's no reason the NPC shouldn't comply, then there's no rolling involved. In the case of a nervous guard, the fact that he's nervous is probably the initial hurdle, set in the context of him doing his job. To go back to your bakery example, if I had an NPC who from my notes was abstemious and also a dick, that will inform his response to the offer of pastries. It won't dictate his response mind you, because that completely negates all the nuance that exists in various specific player approaches and declarations, but it will inform his response. I'm not sure where that leaves me on the question of what do I use notes for relative to framing versus adjudication.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f914.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure    :unsure:"  data-smilie="24"data-shortname=":unsure:" /></blockquote>

Verification