Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Realistic Consequences vs Gameplay
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 8012188" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>In the example given, 1-3 GM narrates and 4-6 player narrates, the dice may grant the player the ability to decide what happens as a result of the action. If they roll high enough, the player has the agency to narrate what happens. They most likely would narrate some form of success for the action in question. </p><p></p><p>If the GM decides, he's likely going to narrate some form of failure or perhaps success with setback or similar. Whatever he decides, the GM is narrating the outcome, not the player, so on a 1-3, the player has no agency. </p><p></p><p>Now imagine on a 1-6 the GM decides. If that's the case, where does the player agency come into it? </p><p></p><p>If things are always up to the GM, then the players cannot know the chances of success for any action they take, not unless the GM decides to share his reasoning or his judgment with them in some manner (perhaps he says "this will be a DC 25 persuasion check" or even just "this is going to be very difficult to pull off" or something similar). And it's also possible to get very used to a specific GM and how they tend to handle such things to the point where players start to become comfortable about gauging their odds for in game actions. </p><p></p><p>None of this changes the fundamental fact that if the GM can always trump the rules, then player agency can effectively become zero under this system.</p><p></p><p>There may be times where it is perfectly reasonable to restrict agency....several examples have been given, whether based on genre or the established fiction, and there are probably others we could come up with, as well. I don't think that anyone here would say that such GM judgment is always bad or anything like that.</p><p></p><p>I think it's just more that rules that so heavily rely on GM judgment in this manner typically will either not offer as much player agency, or can be more susceptible to an arbitrary reduction in such agency. They also tend to lend themselves to potentially unclear situations such as may have existed in the OP.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 8012188, member: 6785785"] In the example given, 1-3 GM narrates and 4-6 player narrates, the dice may grant the player the ability to decide what happens as a result of the action. If they roll high enough, the player has the agency to narrate what happens. They most likely would narrate some form of success for the action in question. If the GM decides, he's likely going to narrate some form of failure or perhaps success with setback or similar. Whatever he decides, the GM is narrating the outcome, not the player, so on a 1-3, the player has no agency. Now imagine on a 1-6 the GM decides. If that's the case, where does the player agency come into it? If things are always up to the GM, then the players cannot know the chances of success for any action they take, not unless the GM decides to share his reasoning or his judgment with them in some manner (perhaps he says "this will be a DC 25 persuasion check" or even just "this is going to be very difficult to pull off" or something similar). And it's also possible to get very used to a specific GM and how they tend to handle such things to the point where players start to become comfortable about gauging their odds for in game actions. None of this changes the fundamental fact that if the GM can always trump the rules, then player agency can effectively become zero under this system. There may be times where it is perfectly reasonable to restrict agency....several examples have been given, whether based on genre or the established fiction, and there are probably others we could come up with, as well. I don't think that anyone here would say that such GM judgment is always bad or anything like that. I think it's just more that rules that so heavily rely on GM judgment in this manner typically will either not offer as much player agency, or can be more susceptible to an arbitrary reduction in such agency. They also tend to lend themselves to potentially unclear situations such as may have existed in the OP. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Realistic Consequences vs Gameplay
Top