Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Realistic Consequences vs Gameplay
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 8013784" data-attributes="member: 6795602"><p>You said "If you want to talk about sums and parts" which implies that I want to talk about sums and parts when I don't. And more importantly it read as a rather dismissive opening to whatever counterpoint you were going to make. That perceived dismissiveness and incorrectness of the statement caused the offense, but apparently based on your comment here it was not intended as such. With no offense intended I no longer take it as such.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree and more importantly I already explained why. You are just restating the same thing here without giving one word to my objection. For your convenience I've reposted it.</p><p></p><p>The question of "how much control do you feel you have over the story you are helping to tell" is only a meaningful indicator of a single type of player agency. It doesn't address the other type/types</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>1. No one here is bound by your definition of agency. That said, I do try to address what you mean and not just the term you are using.</p><p>2. If your definition of agency is not so simple, then it's very possible I missed something important from it.</p><p>3. Repeating yourself that D&D is low agency isn't helpful. My point was that there are at least 2 types of player agency and so your statement isn't entirely correct. You could maybe address why you disagree with my point instead of repeating yourself?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmmmm.... let me get this straight, you are telling me I've using a wrong term which I would be willing to discuss, but then you tell me that based on the term I'm not even using that I've badly misunderstood everything.</p><p></p><p>IMO it's more likely that I'm using the term in a way that doesn't align with how you use any of your terms and that to reconcile that difference you are trying to force my use of the term to align to a different term of yours even though it doens't. I mean it would be a lot simpler for you if I was simply using fictional as you use narrative. That's what I believe is happening here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think mine is particularly unique - others seem to understand me pretty well and a lot of vocabulary on this topic is based on what others have said. That said, you say "fictional outcomes" very different than narrative control. So please give me an example of a fictional outcome, or maybe even a few. I'd like to see for myself how they actually differ.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Point was Just that you appeared you understand the impact and importance of what was going on there and now it appears you are taking quite a different position.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 8013784, member: 6795602"] You said "If you want to talk about sums and parts" which implies that I want to talk about sums and parts when I don't. And more importantly it read as a rather dismissive opening to whatever counterpoint you were going to make. That perceived dismissiveness and incorrectness of the statement caused the offense, but apparently based on your comment here it was not intended as such. With no offense intended I no longer take it as such. I disagree and more importantly I already explained why. You are just restating the same thing here without giving one word to my objection. For your convenience I've reposted it. The question of "how much control do you feel you have over the story you are helping to tell" is only a meaningful indicator of a single type of player agency. It doesn't address the other type/types 1. No one here is bound by your definition of agency. That said, I do try to address what you mean and not just the term you are using. 2. If your definition of agency is not so simple, then it's very possible I missed something important from it. 3. Repeating yourself that D&D is low agency isn't helpful. My point was that there are at least 2 types of player agency and so your statement isn't entirely correct. You could maybe address why you disagree with my point instead of repeating yourself? Hmmmm.... let me get this straight, you are telling me I've using a wrong term which I would be willing to discuss, but then you tell me that based on the term I'm not even using that I've badly misunderstood everything. IMO it's more likely that I'm using the term in a way that doesn't align with how you use any of your terms and that to reconcile that difference you are trying to force my use of the term to align to a different term of yours even though it doens't. I mean it would be a lot simpler for you if I was simply using fictional as you use narrative. That's what I believe is happening here. I don't think mine is particularly unique - others seem to understand me pretty well and a lot of vocabulary on this topic is based on what others have said. That said, you say "fictional outcomes" very different than narrative control. So please give me an example of a fictional outcome, or maybe even a few. I'd like to see for myself how they actually differ. Point was Just that you appeared you understand the impact and importance of what was going on there and now it appears you are taking quite a different position. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Realistic Consequences vs Gameplay
Top