Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Realms Reborn: A different kind of organized play
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pauper" data-source="post: 7479860" data-attributes="member: 17607"><p>WotC, as an entity, doesn't care about cons, per se. They have vendors who organize their Organized Play events for them -- at most of the big cons, that vendor is Baldman Games, and at smaller cons, it's a local who may or may not have been part of the old 'coordinator' system. Baldman probably won't bother with a rival for their business (they did nothing at GenCon 2018 when <a href="http://www.contessa.rocks/ddep0701-gen-con-2018/" target="_blank">ConTessa ran a number of AL events</a> in parallel with Baldman's own events), and smaller organizers likely won't have much ability to complain unless they already have an 'in' with con management, which is really a different issue.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I think the project, while well-intended, has failed to think through its organization and likely will never get fully off the ground. For example, they claim the organizing principle of their program is "[e]very DM is the God and controller of their own table and game," yet they include this bit in their call to DMs:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So on the one hand, there isn't a 'dictator' of Realms Reborn, but on the other hand, if it's in the wiki, then every Realms Reborn DM is obligated to allow it in their game. That kinda sounds like the wiki is the dictator to me.</p><p></p><p>Supposedly there's a 'DM Calls' log that allows you to break the rules, but there's no mechanism for enforcing that log except the idea that any DM can reject anything listed on the DM Calls log.</p><p></p><p>I applaud the designers for trying to emphasize DM freedom as a way of encouraging DMs to sign up for the program -- the number of available DMs is basically the bottleneck in any RPG Organized Play system -- but this seems like a hastily thought-out hack that's going to end up defaulting to AL norms as soon as anything truly controversial comes up. (As an example, they've already adopted 'PH+1' from AL as a core campaign rule.)</p><p></p><p>No need to hate on Realms Reborn -- they just need to take more inspiration from successful third-party OP campaigns like NASCRAG and Ashes of Athas. If they can do that, and create a successful organized play experience, that's nothing but good for players who find themselves disillusioned by the AL experience.</p><p></p><p>--</p><p>Pauper</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pauper, post: 7479860, member: 17607"] WotC, as an entity, doesn't care about cons, per se. They have vendors who organize their Organized Play events for them -- at most of the big cons, that vendor is Baldman Games, and at smaller cons, it's a local who may or may not have been part of the old 'coordinator' system. Baldman probably won't bother with a rival for their business (they did nothing at GenCon 2018 when [URL="http://www.contessa.rocks/ddep0701-gen-con-2018/"]ConTessa ran a number of AL events[/URL] in parallel with Baldman's own events), and smaller organizers likely won't have much ability to complain unless they already have an 'in' with con management, which is really a different issue. Personally, I think the project, while well-intended, has failed to think through its organization and likely will never get fully off the ground. For example, they claim the organizing principle of their program is "[e]very DM is the God and controller of their own table and game," yet they include this bit in their call to DMs: So on the one hand, there isn't a 'dictator' of Realms Reborn, but on the other hand, if it's in the wiki, then every Realms Reborn DM is obligated to allow it in their game. That kinda sounds like the wiki is the dictator to me. Supposedly there's a 'DM Calls' log that allows you to break the rules, but there's no mechanism for enforcing that log except the idea that any DM can reject anything listed on the DM Calls log. I applaud the designers for trying to emphasize DM freedom as a way of encouraging DMs to sign up for the program -- the number of available DMs is basically the bottleneck in any RPG Organized Play system -- but this seems like a hastily thought-out hack that's going to end up defaulting to AL norms as soon as anything truly controversial comes up. (As an example, they've already adopted 'PH+1' from AL as a core campaign rule.) No need to hate on Realms Reborn -- they just need to take more inspiration from successful third-party OP campaigns like NASCRAG and Ashes of Athas. If they can do that, and create a successful organized play experience, that's nothing but good for players who find themselves disillusioned by the AL experience. -- Pauper [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Realms Reborn: A different kind of organized play
Top