Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Realmstalk (if you love it or hate it come on in)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zarrock God of Evil" data-source="post: 644004" data-attributes="member: 2025"><p>BACKGROUND: </p><p></p><p>First came into FR through the Moonshae trilogy and later the Avatar trilogy. I was first introduced to the FR as a campaign setting by my older cousin. When I shifted from DL to FR (2E grey boxed set), I suddenly felt that I had the space, cultural options and organisations at my hands that I had been missing since my Known World days in OD&D. </p><p></p><p>I've played a modified version of FR since 1995 and I am currently adapting it to fit with the - IMO absolutely wonderful FRCS - and the changes it instated in the Realms. </p><p></p><p>Computer games like Baldur's Gate have really managed to bring the Realms to life and I immediately started a campaign in Amn after playing through the whole series.</p><p></p><p>WHAT I LIKE:</p><p></p><p>The feel is grittier now than ever and the villanious organisations are great </p><p></p><p>I love the Shades - especially the artwork. </p><p></p><p>The Realms provide enormous possibilities and character options -any kind of cultural and racial background is feasible. </p><p></p><p>The rules options in the new FR line are terrific and evocative. Just my taste in PrC, spells, new domains, monsters and races. Regional feats are a great addition to the system. To my mind the FR rules are DnD Deluxe.</p><p></p><p>The FRCS is well-organised and very utilitarian - much more so than the mishmash that was the 2E Campaign Box (pure fluff). </p><p></p><p>Elves and Dwarves are on their way back - thank you. The tolkienesque approach is wonderful in LotR but I don't want it in my campaign.</p><p></p><p>WHAT I DON'T LIKE </p><p></p><p>I have a lot of work to do if I want to integrate the cool changes to the timeline from FRCS into my own timeline. But this is a positive problem - I want to integrate the changes WotC made AND keep my additions. A minor issue...</p><p></p><p>I want the whole world detailed - 3E supplements for Zakhara, Maztica and especially Kara-Tur are sorely missed.</p><p></p><p>WHAT I CHANGED</p><p></p><p>I added the continent of Taladas to the FR (so cool - but no room for it in DL IMO)</p><p></p><p>The unknown lands are Nyambe (African settings) and another is a great Irda Empire (I love the Irda - just not the static DL ones - these are High Ogres - some good, some evil). </p><p></p><p>I added an evil god and some evil organisations of my own.</p><p></p><p>Tharizdun and the ToEE are core parts of my Realms campaign.</p><p></p><p>-Zarrock</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zarrock God of Evil, post: 644004, member: 2025"] BACKGROUND: First came into FR through the Moonshae trilogy and later the Avatar trilogy. I was first introduced to the FR as a campaign setting by my older cousin. When I shifted from DL to FR (2E grey boxed set), I suddenly felt that I had the space, cultural options and organisations at my hands that I had been missing since my Known World days in OD&D. I've played a modified version of FR since 1995 and I am currently adapting it to fit with the - IMO absolutely wonderful FRCS - and the changes it instated in the Realms. Computer games like Baldur's Gate have really managed to bring the Realms to life and I immediately started a campaign in Amn after playing through the whole series. WHAT I LIKE: The feel is grittier now than ever and the villanious organisations are great I love the Shades - especially the artwork. The Realms provide enormous possibilities and character options -any kind of cultural and racial background is feasible. The rules options in the new FR line are terrific and evocative. Just my taste in PrC, spells, new domains, monsters and races. Regional feats are a great addition to the system. To my mind the FR rules are DnD Deluxe. The FRCS is well-organised and very utilitarian - much more so than the mishmash that was the 2E Campaign Box (pure fluff). Elves and Dwarves are on their way back - thank you. The tolkienesque approach is wonderful in LotR but I don't want it in my campaign. WHAT I DON'T LIKE I have a lot of work to do if I want to integrate the cool changes to the timeline from FRCS into my own timeline. But this is a positive problem - I want to integrate the changes WotC made AND keep my additions. A minor issue... I want the whole world detailed - 3E supplements for Zakhara, Maztica and especially Kara-Tur are sorely missed. WHAT I CHANGED I added the continent of Taladas to the FR (so cool - but no room for it in DL IMO) The unknown lands are Nyambe (African settings) and another is a great Irda Empire (I love the Irda - just not the static DL ones - these are High Ogres - some good, some evil). I added an evil god and some evil organisations of my own. Tharizdun and the ToEE are core parts of my Realms campaign. -Zarrock [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Realmstalk (if you love it or hate it come on in)
Top