Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 5939295" data-attributes="member: 2067">I don't think that's a problem. There could be a million. A billion. There's no quantity of classes in existence that, for me, is, "Too Much."All I need is "enough for my players to be happy."Now, from a business perspective, WotC might themselves not want to blow a lot of money making a lot of new classes (there are certainly diminishing returns). But there's demand for a paladin class, so that should be fine at least. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />What end does drawing the line there serve? Why draw the line there? Why define this as something WotC should categorically do rather than something you can do at your own tables for your own games?I could quibble, but I don't really think there's anything wrong with you not liking the Paladin class for any reason you can think of. It's OK that you don't like the Paladin class. You might not like it for a solid reason ("makes a better prestige class"), you might not like it for an arbitrary reason ("I don't like Authurian heroes"), you might not like it for an absurd reason ("Classes that begin with the letter P clearly indicate that WotC hates stutterers!"). Whatever. It's cool. It's not OK that because of this you want to remove the Paladin class from everyone's version of D&D. So it's great that YOU don't want a paladin.It's not so great that you don't want ANYONE to have a paladin.</blockquote>

Verification