Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rebutting a fallacy: why I await 5e (without holding my breath)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aberzanzorax" data-source="post: 5626413" data-attributes="member: 64209"><p>Well, here's the thing about 5e and D&D in general...</p><p> </p><p>It's all well and good to make the very, very finest RPG in the world. It could be rules light, but with complex options. It could be fast to play and detailed enough for combats to be tactical. It could be perfectly balanced and allow for massive diveristy.</p><p> </p><p>It could also be made by White Wolf and have nothing to do with D&D.</p><p> </p><p>Or it could be made by Goodman Games and have nothing to do with D&D.</p><p> </p><p>Or it could be made by WotC and have nothing to do with D&D.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>It might even have the name D&D on it.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>My point is, is that there's making a great game, and then there's making a great version of D&D. To some, the revolution and reinvention of the game with 4e was spectacular, and yet managed to capture the feel of D&D. To others it was spectacular, does not capture the feel of D&D, and they love it anyway. To others it was spectacular, does not capture the feel of D&D, and for this reason they dislike it.</p><p> </p><p>Innovation is good. However, innovation is limited if you want to call it the same game. Addition of too many new elements and subtraction of too many other (especially "sacred cows", i.e. pivotal genre and structure defining elements) and it might be a great game, but it will no longer be the SAME game.</p><p> </p><p>Throw out the fluff of the forgotten realms, add dragonborn and tieflings as core races, change the outer planes, radically change how healing works (and magic in general), etc. etc... Each of these changes, on its own is fine. </p><p> </p><p>However, if someone from 1977 (or even from 1999 or 2005) saw me playing an all tiefling and dragonborn party of warlords and warlocks, I doubt they'd recognize it as D&D. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Final point: It's fine to make a great new game, but if you want the people playing an existing game to be your core market, it needs to maintain enough similarity to that existing game for them to want to play it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aberzanzorax, post: 5626413, member: 64209"] Well, here's the thing about 5e and D&D in general... It's all well and good to make the very, very finest RPG in the world. It could be rules light, but with complex options. It could be fast to play and detailed enough for combats to be tactical. It could be perfectly balanced and allow for massive diveristy. It could also be made by White Wolf and have nothing to do with D&D. Or it could be made by Goodman Games and have nothing to do with D&D. Or it could be made by WotC and have nothing to do with D&D. It might even have the name D&D on it. My point is, is that there's making a great game, and then there's making a great version of D&D. To some, the revolution and reinvention of the game with 4e was spectacular, and yet managed to capture the feel of D&D. To others it was spectacular, does not capture the feel of D&D, and they love it anyway. To others it was spectacular, does not capture the feel of D&D, and for this reason they dislike it. Innovation is good. However, innovation is limited if you want to call it the same game. Addition of too many new elements and subtraction of too many other (especially "sacred cows", i.e. pivotal genre and structure defining elements) and it might be a great game, but it will no longer be the SAME game. Throw out the fluff of the forgotten realms, add dragonborn and tieflings as core races, change the outer planes, radically change how healing works (and magic in general), etc. etc... Each of these changes, on its own is fine. However, if someone from 1977 (or even from 1999 or 2005) saw me playing an all tiefling and dragonborn party of warlords and warlocks, I doubt they'd recognize it as D&D. Final point: It's fine to make a great new game, but if you want the people playing an existing game to be your core market, it needs to maintain enough similarity to that existing game for them to want to play it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Rebutting a fallacy: why I await 5e (without holding my breath)
Top