Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="billd91" data-source="post: 8488493" data-attributes="member: 3400">Quite a few came up on the Paizo boards several years back. In Sean K Reynolds's write-up of Erastil, he was described as being a bit of an old fashioned male chauvinist while also being Lawful Good. There were also discussions about people living in a culture that had legal slavery not being able to be good unless they were actively opposing the practice (despite the potential to be killed for said opposition and no matter what other good you do). These, of course, were fodder for some pretty bitter discussions.Basically, it ends up being a fairly common sentiment on message boards that Good's got to be perfect and not good with nearly every topic you can otherwise throw at it. One failure to be completely good on every topic, in the eyes of some observers, is utterly disqualifying. As I see it, that's just the old paladin debate writ even larger and broader.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="billd91, post: 8488493, member: 3400"] Quite a few came up on the Paizo boards several years back. In Sean K Reynolds's write-up of Erastil, he was described as being a bit of an old fashioned male chauvinist while also being Lawful Good. There were also discussions about people living in a culture that had legal slavery not being able to be good unless they were actively opposing the practice (despite the potential to be killed for said opposition and no matter what other good you do). These, of course, were fodder for some pretty bitter discussions. Basically, it ends up being a fairly common sentiment on message boards that Good's got to be [B]perfect [/B]and not good with nearly every topic you can otherwise throw at it. One failure to be completely good on every topic, in the eyes of some observers, is utterly disqualifying. As I see it, that's just the old paladin debate writ even larger and broader. [/QUOTE]

Verification