Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Reckless Attack / Mirror Image
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arial Black" data-source="post: 7120338" data-attributes="member: 6799649"><p>The game mechanics have each actor taking turns, but the mechanics are simulating constant, simultaneous action.</p><p></p><p>You don't frantically do stuff, stand still for six seconds while everyone else does their stuff, then they stand still while you do your stuff.</p><p></p><p>Similarly, on your turn you have an action and a possible bonus action, and you can take them in any order (although some bonus actions may have timing restrictions <em>vis a vis</em> the action, like TWF).</p><p></p><p>So imagine you want to do these things in sequence, as quickly as you can: cast a spell, begin raging, and attack. A perfectly sound sequence. You can cast spells when not raging but lose the ability to cast while you are raging, and you want to attack as soon as you can after raging so that your Rage doesn't end early.</p><p></p><p>In the narrative you are: casting->Raging->attacking, in sequence, as quickly as you can, without interruption.</p><p></p><p>In the structure of the combat rounds you are still doing those same things in the same order as quickly as you can.</p><p></p><p>It could be done in two ways: round 1, action to cast. Round 2, bonus action to Rage, action to attack.</p><p></p><p>OR it could be: round 1, action to cast, bonus action to Rage. Round 2, action to attack.</p><p></p><p>These are the same actions in the same order without any interruption. It is absurd to interpret the wording of Rage such that it ends early in one example but not the other, because they are the exact same sequence of events!</p><p></p><p>Sure, they could tighten up the wording, but if you interpret that wording to mean that in the second example the Rage ends the very moment it begins then you are choosing to interpret it in an absurd way when you could just as easily interpret it in the intended way: the Rage ends early if the Rage has been going on too long without you attacking or taking damage. It doesn't end the moment it begins because of the meta game of creatures taking turns.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arial Black, post: 7120338, member: 6799649"] The game mechanics have each actor taking turns, but the mechanics are simulating constant, simultaneous action. You don't frantically do stuff, stand still for six seconds while everyone else does their stuff, then they stand still while you do your stuff. Similarly, on your turn you have an action and a possible bonus action, and you can take them in any order (although some bonus actions may have timing restrictions [i]vis a vis[/i] the action, like TWF). So imagine you want to do these things in sequence, as quickly as you can: cast a spell, begin raging, and attack. A perfectly sound sequence. You can cast spells when not raging but lose the ability to cast while you are raging, and you want to attack as soon as you can after raging so that your Rage doesn't end early. In the narrative you are: casting->Raging->attacking, in sequence, as quickly as you can, without interruption. In the structure of the combat rounds you are still doing those same things in the same order as quickly as you can. It could be done in two ways: round 1, action to cast. Round 2, bonus action to Rage, action to attack. OR it could be: round 1, action to cast, bonus action to Rage. Round 2, action to attack. These are the same actions in the same order without any interruption. It is absurd to interpret the wording of Rage such that it ends early in one example but not the other, because they are the exact same sequence of events! Sure, they could tighten up the wording, but if you interpret that wording to mean that in the second example the Rage ends the very moment it begins then you are choosing to interpret it in an absurd way when you could just as easily interpret it in the intended way: the Rage ends early if the Rage has been going on too long without you attacking or taking damage. It doesn't end the moment it begins because of the meta game of creatures taking turns. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Reckless Attack / Mirror Image
Top