Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jeffh" data-source="post: 4447647" data-attributes="member: 2642">So...<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Are my criteria too demanding?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Are people just not that impressed with the homebrew classes that exist to date?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Or is it too soon (rules not fully absorbed, too few homebrews complete enough to judge fairly, etc) for my question to really be a reasonable one?</li> </ul>I can't imagine the lack of response reflects lack of interest in the topic...(BTW, I'm fairly impressed with Saric's bard and druid, particularly the latter's use of stances, though non-Stance Wild Shape powers need some clarification. I might allow one or both of those. But neither answers the need for a second controller...)Oh, and an additional criterion suggested by my third bullet point above is that the class should be complete enough that I wouldn't feel like an idiot offering it to someone to play. Let's say either the Heroic tier should be done (with a full range of options comparable to the Player's Handbook classes), or there should be enough done to play up to the end of the Paragon tier (with enough options to make a 20th level character, but not necessarily as many as a PH class, i.e. a minimum of two at-will powers, one power in each other slot, and one paragon path).</blockquote>