Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Reconcile This - A DM Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 6057870" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>So it's a good thing then that the rules don't work that way.</p><p> </p><p>My 3.5 DMG says explicitly:</p><p></p><p>Do you have references for these contrary explicit, broad, discretionary powers that DM's are to use instead of the above quote? I'm not asserting they're not there (yet) but I sure don't remember reading them and didn't stumble across them when looking up the rules in the PH and DMG again before writing my post.</p><p> </p><p>Death to the fairies then I guess. The DMG goes to lengths to delineate the 3 limited methods in its rules for beginning an encounter based strictly on "awareness", but no more than that. While I didn't re-read the whole DMG the only bit I could find that I can see might be confused with "broad, discretionary, powers" is the 3-sentence paragraph on DMG p.25 under the heading of "Adjudicating Actions Not Covered" which says that the rules can't cover everything, the DM will have to make up rules on the spot to cover what the rules don't, and that the rules for combat actions should be used as guidelines for making those rules.</p><p> </p><p>So, in repeating the DMG I said that the situation was not covered by the rules, that in the given situation the DM needs to make his own rule, and I suggested the simplest and IMO most sensible thing to do is to otherwise follow all normal rules for combat and simply declare that the ranger goes first in initiative order without rolling.</p><p> </p><p>And another fairie skull is crushed under the heel of my iron boot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 6057870, member: 32740"] So it's a good thing then that the rules don't work that way. My 3.5 DMG says explicitly: Do you have references for these contrary explicit, broad, discretionary powers that DM's are to use instead of the above quote? I'm not asserting they're not there (yet) but I sure don't remember reading them and didn't stumble across them when looking up the rules in the PH and DMG again before writing my post. Death to the fairies then I guess. The DMG goes to lengths to delineate the 3 limited methods in its rules for beginning an encounter based strictly on "awareness", but no more than that. While I didn't re-read the whole DMG the only bit I could find that I can see might be confused with "broad, discretionary, powers" is the 3-sentence paragraph on DMG p.25 under the heading of "Adjudicating Actions Not Covered" which says that the rules can't cover everything, the DM will have to make up rules on the spot to cover what the rules don't, and that the rules for combat actions should be used as guidelines for making those rules. So, in repeating the DMG I said that the situation was not covered by the rules, that in the given situation the DM needs to make his own rule, and I suggested the simplest and IMO most sensible thing to do is to otherwise follow all normal rules for combat and simply declare that the ranger goes first in initiative order without rolling. And another fairie skull is crushed under the heel of my iron boot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Reconcile This - A DM Question
Top