Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Reconciling 4e's rough edges with Story Now play
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="andreszarta" data-source="post: 8991601" data-attributes="member: 7036985"><p>Hey EnWorld!</p><p></p><p>My last dalliance with 4e was back in 2017 when I briefly ran a short campaign for a group of friends who were interested in playing the game with a more <em>Story Now</em> approach. Back in the day I was drawing a lot of inspiration from the discussions that were held here, in threads like <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/pemertonian-scene-framing-a-good-approach-to-d-d-4e.333786/" target="_blank">Pemertonian Scene-Framing; A Good Approach to D&D 4e</a>.</p><p></p><p>My thinking and experience with <em>Story Now</em> gaming wasn't nearly as mature as it is nowadays with most of my current gaming being firmly rooted in the PbtA tradition. As I am preparing to revisit 4e with the eventual intent of running it, I want to ask for your help in trying to understand and reconcile what I consider to be some of the rough edges in the system that seem to be pointing away from that particular agenda. Since I have a good number of these questions, I kind of want to go in order and explore each one deeply before moving on to the next, but I'm also very open to have the conversation move to surprising places as very often I found those to be tremendously educational and have others point me at their own points of contention. All good contributions!</p><p></p><p>Let's start with skills. Chapter 5 of the PHB1 talks about skills in a manner similar to every other edition of D&D, a general overview of what each does, its related stats and then a discussion of its associated mechanics. Each skill seems to want to focus on a series of special use cases (such as Heal's <em>First Aid </em>or Dungeoneering <em>Forage) </em>that point at the different ways these skills are meant to be invoked<em>. </em></p><p></p><p>When I read these use cases, I don't know why my mind is unable to read them as, say how I would read a PbtA playbook move, and instead what I get from them is a really strong pull towards <em>Right to Dream</em> play were these actions can't meaningfully exist without the more naturalistic approach to exploration.</p><p></p><p>Let's look at Acrobatics, for instance:</p><p></p><p><strong>Acrobatics (Dexterity)</strong></p><p><em>Armor Check Penalty</em></p><p>You can perform an acrobatic stunt, keep your balance while walking on narrow or unstable surfaces, slip free of a grab or restraints, or take less damage from a fall.</p><p></p><p><strong>Acrobatic Stunt</strong></p><p><em>Make an Acrobatics check to swing from a chandelier, somersault over an opponent, slide down a staircase on your shield, or attempt any other acrobatic stunt that you can imagine and that your DM agrees to let you try. The DM sets the DC based on the complexity of the stunt and the danger of the situation. If the stunt fails, you fall prone in the square where you began the stunt (the DM might change where you land, depending on the specific stunt and situation). Your DM always has the right to say that a stunt won’t work in a particular situation or to set a high DC.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Acrobatic Stunt: Standard action or move action, depending on the stunt.</em></p><p><em>✦ DC: Base DC 15.</em></p><p><em>✦ Success: You perform an acrobatic stunt.</em></p><p><em>✦ Failure: You fail to pull off the stunt and might fall or suffer some other consequence.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Balance</strong></p><p><em>Make an Acrobatics check to move across a surface less than 1 foot wide (such as a ledge or a tightrope) or across an unstable surface (such as a wind-tossed rope bridge or a rocking log).</em></p><p><em>Balance: Part of a move action.</em></p><p><em>✦ DC: See the table.</em></p><p><em>✦ Success: You can move one-half your speed across a narrow or unstable surface.</em></p><p><em>✦ Fail by 4 or Less: You stay in the square you started in and lose the rest of your move action, but you don’t fall. You can try again as part of a move action.</em></p><p><em>✦ Fail by 5 or More: You fall off the surface (see “Falling,” page 284) and lose the rest of your move action. If you are trying to move across an unstable surface that isn’t narrow, you instead fall prone in the square you started in. You can try again as part of a move action if you’re still on the surface.</em></p><p><em>✦ Grant Combat Advantage: While you are balancing, enemies have combat advantage against you.</em></p><p><em>✦ Taking Damage: If you take damage, you must make a new Acrobatics check to remain standing.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Reduce Falling Damage (Trained Only)</strong></p><p><em>If you fall or jump down from a height, you can make an Acrobatics check to reduce the amount of falling damage you take.</em></p><p><em>Reduce Falling Damage: Free action if you fall or a move action if you jump down.</em></p><p><em>✦ Damage Reduced: Make an Acrobatics check, and reduce the amount of falling damage you take by one-half your check result (round down).</em></p><p></p><p>When I read Balance action for instance, where success means y<em>ou can move one-half your speed across a narrow or unstable surface...</em>I mean cool, that's what physically happens in the fiction but we got no meaningful output with regards to whatever <strong>conflict</strong> we are meant to be resolving. Instead we got a output that sort of demands that attention is placed in the minute details of the fiction, and leaves conflict resolution to GM Fiat.</p><p></p><p>So I guess my questions are:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Is it just me who is reading skills incorrectly? If so, what am I missing and how am I not seeing them in the proper light? How are these working, as written, to support <em>Story Now</em>? When are we supposed to be rolling them?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Do others see this similarly? What use are you giving skills then? I assume primarily Skill Challenges but are there other use cases?</li> </ul><p>I friendly summon [USER=42582]@pemerton[/USER], [USER=16586]@Campbell[/USER], [USER=6696971]@Manbearcat[/USER], [USER=99817]@chaochou[/USER], [USER=463]@S'mon[/USER] and any others who have experience with this style of play! At some point I want to talk about Rituals and Utility-Based Magic Items and I would really like to learn from you all, as I have done before.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="andreszarta, post: 8991601, member: 7036985"] Hey EnWorld! My last dalliance with 4e was back in 2017 when I briefly ran a short campaign for a group of friends who were interested in playing the game with a more [I]Story Now[/I] approach. Back in the day I was drawing a lot of inspiration from the discussions that were held here, in threads like [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/pemertonian-scene-framing-a-good-approach-to-d-d-4e.333786/']Pemertonian Scene-Framing; A Good Approach to D&D 4e[/URL]. My thinking and experience with [I]Story Now[/I] gaming wasn't nearly as mature as it is nowadays with most of my current gaming being firmly rooted in the PbtA tradition. As I am preparing to revisit 4e with the eventual intent of running it, I want to ask for your help in trying to understand and reconcile what I consider to be some of the rough edges in the system that seem to be pointing away from that particular agenda. Since I have a good number of these questions, I kind of want to go in order and explore each one deeply before moving on to the next, but I'm also very open to have the conversation move to surprising places as very often I found those to be tremendously educational and have others point me at their own points of contention. All good contributions! Let's start with skills. Chapter 5 of the PHB1 talks about skills in a manner similar to every other edition of D&D, a general overview of what each does, its related stats and then a discussion of its associated mechanics. Each skill seems to want to focus on a series of special use cases (such as Heal's [I]First Aid [/I]or Dungeoneering [I]Forage) [/I]that point at the different ways these skills are meant to be invoked[I]. [/I] When I read these use cases, I don't know why my mind is unable to read them as, say how I would read a PbtA playbook move, and instead what I get from them is a really strong pull towards [I]Right to Dream[/I] play were these actions can't meaningfully exist without the more naturalistic approach to exploration. Let's look at Acrobatics, for instance: [B]Acrobatics (Dexterity)[/B] [I]Armor Check Penalty[/I] You can perform an acrobatic stunt, keep your balance while walking on narrow or unstable surfaces, slip free of a grab or restraints, or take less damage from a fall. [B]Acrobatic Stunt[/B] [I]Make an Acrobatics check to swing from a chandelier, somersault over an opponent, slide down a staircase on your shield, or attempt any other acrobatic stunt that you can imagine and that your DM agrees to let you try. The DM sets the DC based on the complexity of the stunt and the danger of the situation. If the stunt fails, you fall prone in the square where you began the stunt (the DM might change where you land, depending on the specific stunt and situation). Your DM always has the right to say that a stunt won’t work in a particular situation or to set a high DC. Acrobatic Stunt: Standard action or move action, depending on the stunt. ✦ DC: Base DC 15. ✦ Success: You perform an acrobatic stunt. ✦ Failure: You fail to pull off the stunt and might fall or suffer some other consequence.[/I] [B]Balance[/B] [I]Make an Acrobatics check to move across a surface less than 1 foot wide (such as a ledge or a tightrope) or across an unstable surface (such as a wind-tossed rope bridge or a rocking log). Balance: Part of a move action. ✦ DC: See the table. ✦ Success: You can move one-half your speed across a narrow or unstable surface. ✦ Fail by 4 or Less: You stay in the square you started in and lose the rest of your move action, but you don’t fall. You can try again as part of a move action. ✦ Fail by 5 or More: You fall off the surface (see “Falling,” page 284) and lose the rest of your move action. If you are trying to move across an unstable surface that isn’t narrow, you instead fall prone in the square you started in. You can try again as part of a move action if you’re still on the surface. ✦ Grant Combat Advantage: While you are balancing, enemies have combat advantage against you. ✦ Taking Damage: If you take damage, you must make a new Acrobatics check to remain standing.[/I] [B]Reduce Falling Damage (Trained Only)[/B] [I]If you fall or jump down from a height, you can make an Acrobatics check to reduce the amount of falling damage you take. Reduce Falling Damage: Free action if you fall or a move action if you jump down. ✦ Damage Reduced: Make an Acrobatics check, and reduce the amount of falling damage you take by one-half your check result (round down).[/I] When I read Balance action for instance, where success means y[I]ou can move one-half your speed across a narrow or unstable surface...[/I]I mean cool, that's what physically happens in the fiction but we got no meaningful output with regards to whatever [B]conflict[/B] we are meant to be resolving. Instead we got a output that sort of demands that attention is placed in the minute details of the fiction, and leaves conflict resolution to GM Fiat. So I guess my questions are: [LIST] [*]Is it just me who is reading skills incorrectly? If so, what am I missing and how am I not seeing them in the proper light? How are these working, as written, to support [I]Story Now[/I]? When are we supposed to be rolling them? [*]Do others see this similarly? What use are you giving skills then? I assume primarily Skill Challenges but are there other use cases? [/LIST] I friendly summon [USER=42582]@pemerton[/USER], [USER=16586]@Campbell[/USER], [USER=6696971]@Manbearcat[/USER], [USER=99817]@chaochou[/USER], [USER=463]@S'mon[/USER] and any others who have experience with this style of play! At some point I want to talk about Rituals and Utility-Based Magic Items and I would really like to learn from you all, as I have done before. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions
Reconciling 4e's rough edges with Story Now play
Top