Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
recruiting players for a mid-level steampunk campaign
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ambrus" data-source="post: 3478595" data-attributes="member: 17691"><p>Land Outcast, I like your character's background. It's an interesting idea to have your character be cursed without his regular monstrous abilities. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>NPC, did you have a chance to look over my elemental writeup? Are we to pick our gear with starting funds appropriate to our characters' level?</p><p></p><p>Also, if I can offer a few comments on your firearms feats... it seems to me that you're giving yourself added work for little reason. It'd be enough to say that firearms are <strong>exotic weapons</strong> and require an appropriate feat to use them without a -4 non-proficiency penalty.</p><p></p><p>Your <strong>marksman</strong> feat seems effectively identical to the Weapon Finesse (firearms) feat.</p><p></p><p><strong>Pistolwhip</strong> seems rather worthless since its benefit (granting a melee attack option that deals 1d3 damage and that provokes an AoO) is almost the same as attacking an opponent with a barehanded punch. Why bother spending a feat on it? Since a character already has to spend an exotic weapon proficiency to use a firearm properly why not simply grant all firearm wielders the ability to pistolwhip with damage identical to that of a club sized for their character? Non-proficient wielders receive a -4 penalty (the same for using an improvised weapon) while proficient users can make a normal melee attack roll.</p><p></p><p><strong>Snipershot</strong> sounds pretty much like it wants to be Weapon Specialization (firearms) to me. Why not just use the existing feats as they appear in the RAW and simply allow them to be taken as normal for firearms? Save yourself the hassle of trying to create and balance new feats. Just a thought. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ambrus, post: 3478595, member: 17691"] Land Outcast, I like your character's background. It's an interesting idea to have your character be cursed without his regular monstrous abilities. :) NPC, did you have a chance to look over my elemental writeup? Are we to pick our gear with starting funds appropriate to our characters' level? Also, if I can offer a few comments on your firearms feats... it seems to me that you're giving yourself added work for little reason. It'd be enough to say that firearms are [B]exotic weapons[/B] and require an appropriate feat to use them without a -4 non-proficiency penalty. Your [B]marksman[/B] feat seems effectively identical to the Weapon Finesse (firearms) feat. [B]Pistolwhip[/B] seems rather worthless since its benefit (granting a melee attack option that deals 1d3 damage and that provokes an AoO) is almost the same as attacking an opponent with a barehanded punch. Why bother spending a feat on it? Since a character already has to spend an exotic weapon proficiency to use a firearm properly why not simply grant all firearm wielders the ability to pistolwhip with damage identical to that of a club sized for their character? Non-proficient wielders receive a -4 penalty (the same for using an improvised weapon) while proficient users can make a normal melee attack roll. [B]Snipershot[/B] sounds pretty much like it wants to be Weapon Specialization (firearms) to me. Why not just use the existing feats as they appear in the RAW and simply allow them to be taken as normal for firearms? Save yourself the hassle of trying to create and balance new feats. Just a thought. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Talking the Talk
recruiting players for a mid-level steampunk campaign
Top
