Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 5313951" data-attributes="member: 48965">And I have told you why I disagree... IMO, the game only takes you up one level so it has significantly less gameplay value than Dragon Age's 5 levels of advancement... The books are of shoddy quality and will not stand up to prolonged use. Now granted this isn't evident until one actually opens the box up and sees that they are little more than thick pamphlets, without which all those shiny bits don't mean squat, but it's still a measure of quality and value. &nbsp;The fact remains that in the long run I feel Dragon Age is a better bang for your buck, not because I prefer the game system but because I have looked over the materials and in the end it actually provides more overall for the money spent. YMMV of course.&nbsp;EDIT:&nbsp; Also I have a problem accepting your logic of people being totally enamored by number of fiddly bits as that would logically stand to reason that games with the most fiddly bits to price ratio would dominate the market and though I could be wrong,&nbsp; I really&nbsp; don't think this is true.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 5313951, member: 48965"] And I have told you why I disagree... IMO, the game only takes you up one level so it has significantly less gameplay value than Dragon Age's 5 levels of advancement... The books are of shoddy quality and will not stand up to prolonged use. Now granted this isn't evident until one actually opens the box up and sees that they are little more than thick pamphlets, without which all those shiny bits don't mean squat, but it's still a measure of quality and value. The fact remains that in the long run I feel Dragon Age is a better bang for your buck, not because I prefer the game system but because I have looked over the materials and in the end it actually provides more overall for the money spent. YMMV of course. EDIT: Also I have a problem accepting your logic of people being totally enamored by number of fiddly bits as that would logically stand to reason that games with the most fiddly bits to price ratio would dominate the market and though I could be wrong, I really don't think this is true. [/QUOTE]

Verification