Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jack99" data-source="post: 5352776" data-attributes="member: 53135">Its just fluff. Its funny, I just saw an interview with some of the designers, and you would almost think that they had read your posts <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> - they were talking about people who were reading way too much into the fluff. Incidentally, this was one of the reasons it was removed (with regards to crunch) at first, when 4e came out. As for the feat itself, it is not at all vague - IMO. When wielding two weapons, you get +1 to damage with any attack you make, no matter which melee weapon you are using. Where is the vague part?</blockquote>