Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dungeonosophy" data-source="post: 8491309" data-attributes="member: 6688049"><p>Well, maybe. That's what a team of rational, intelligent, experienced cultural consultants are there for. To make nuanced, human judgement calls.</p><p>Even though I'm not exactly an atheist, I feel ya there...I always thought that Wall of the Faithless was lame, for the very reasons you stated. Maybe the cultural amends team <em>would</em> bring in a Humanist/Secular consultant for that issue, and gain an objective perspective about the magnitude of the prejudice against nontheism. And Wizards would make commensurate amends.</p><p></p><p>Having deeply and experientially studied the false dichotomy between "faith-based worldviews" and "secular worldviews", I know there are perennial human commonalities that are insensitively trampled on by TSR/Wizards' hamhandedly theistic Wall of the Faithless. I agree with you. And a team of cultural consultants worth their salt would be able to sift through these concerns, and discern their magnitude.</p><p></p><p>So yeah, there very well could be a DRAGON+ amends article about the problematic aspects of the Wall of the Faithless and of the Athar Faction. And it would be perpetually linked to all the product pages which feature the Wall and the Athar. And there'd be a Humanist charity which is supported by those products.</p><p></p><p>A professional Romani cultural consultant is objective enough to find every little piece of text or imagery which shows Romani-based prejudice. Their eyes will see things that laymen won't. They are qualified to objectively weigh the magnitude of those prejudices relative to other Romani-related prejudices they've encountered in their work in many contexts. That's why they're Romani cultural sensitivity consultants.</p><p></p><p>Of course, they would not be brought in to read any work that does not remotely have Romani-based content. For example, in my readthrough of GAZ10, I didn't notice any Romani motifs whatsoever. (thankfully!)</p><p></p><p>Wizards knows how to find specialized cultural consultants. There are persons who are able to intelligently and objectively provide consultation for each of the nine cultures I identified in GAZ10.</p><p></p><p>Even a non-specialized member of the Wizards cultural amends team could put sticky notes on the various issues which may be of concern, and discern which specialists do or don't need to be called to comb through the text. This process would be aided by crowdsourced flagging.</p><p></p><p>Note: I'm guessing that gender representation may be one of the most common prejudices in the legacy products. So the feminist/gender cultural consultant would probably be present for most of the amends discussions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dungeonosophy, post: 8491309, member: 6688049"] Well, maybe. That's what a team of rational, intelligent, experienced cultural consultants are there for. To make nuanced, human judgement calls. Even though I'm not exactly an atheist, I feel ya there...I always thought that Wall of the Faithless was lame, for the very reasons you stated. Maybe the cultural amends team [I]would[/I] bring in a Humanist/Secular consultant for that issue, and gain an objective perspective about the magnitude of the prejudice against nontheism. And Wizards would make commensurate amends. Having deeply and experientially studied the false dichotomy between "faith-based worldviews" and "secular worldviews", I know there are perennial human commonalities that are insensitively trampled on by TSR/Wizards' hamhandedly theistic Wall of the Faithless. I agree with you. And a team of cultural consultants worth their salt would be able to sift through these concerns, and discern their magnitude. So yeah, there very well could be a DRAGON+ amends article about the problematic aspects of the Wall of the Faithless and of the Athar Faction. And it would be perpetually linked to all the product pages which feature the Wall and the Athar. And there'd be a Humanist charity which is supported by those products. A professional Romani cultural consultant is objective enough to find every little piece of text or imagery which shows Romani-based prejudice. Their eyes will see things that laymen won't. They are qualified to objectively weigh the magnitude of those prejudices relative to other Romani-related prejudices they've encountered in their work in many contexts. That's why they're Romani cultural sensitivity consultants. Of course, they would not be brought in to read any work that does not remotely have Romani-based content. For example, in my readthrough of GAZ10, I didn't notice any Romani motifs whatsoever. (thankfully!) Wizards knows how to find specialized cultural consultants. There are persons who are able to intelligently and objectively provide consultation for each of the nine cultures I identified in GAZ10. Even a non-specialized member of the Wizards cultural amends team could put sticky notes on the various issues which may be of concern, and discern which specialists do or don't need to be called to comb through the text. This process would be aided by crowdsourced flagging. Note: I'm guessing that gender representation may be one of the most common prejudices in the legacy products. So the feminist/gender cultural consultant would probably be present for most of the amends discussions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
Top