Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Helldritch" data-source="post: 8491314" data-attributes="member: 6855114"><p>In short, what we have here is second to third degree references. The orcs are emulating a fictional nation that is inspired by a real world culture (or more than one as a mixed bag of references). </p><p></p><p>Taken as is, at the first degree as you do, these references are distasteful and are some point shocking for some. But taken at the second and third degree as these orcs are supposed to be taken, the distasteful aspect becomes cynical and easily ignored. Here we are seeing a noble nation being inefficively copied by a race. The real world nation being the fantasy nations thus copies are nobles and not depicted in any negative way. These orcs are thus a parody of a fantasy nation and have nothing to relate to a real world culture but to a fantasy nation inspired by a real world culture. </p><p></p><p>In essence, you are saying that the fantasy cultures should be offended but they do not exist...</p><p></p><p>Also, a lot of references to pop culture of the time are made, the boom box comes to mind and so are the punk references. At that time, we had a say that Punk's not dead! These orcs are a clear reference to that too...</p><p></p><p>With a product that is supposed to be taken at second and even sometimes third degree, there are some that will not see what you see. This is what is highly debatable. The parody of an inspiration is not mocking the culture that inspired the nation that is parodied. </p><p></p><p>Was it well executed? Nope. </p><p>Can it be badly interpreted? Of course.</p><p>Can it be seen in different light? Definitely.</p><p>Could it have been better executed and written? Most definitely yes.</p><p></p><p>This Gaz, has very little going for it. But I take it for what it is. A badly written book that did not think every aspects of its approach carefully. But I really doubt that bad intentions were in mind in the first place.</p><p></p><p>I really like to think that this way of writing is past us.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Helldritch, post: 8491314, member: 6855114"] In short, what we have here is second to third degree references. The orcs are emulating a fictional nation that is inspired by a real world culture (or more than one as a mixed bag of references). Taken as is, at the first degree as you do, these references are distasteful and are some point shocking for some. But taken at the second and third degree as these orcs are supposed to be taken, the distasteful aspect becomes cynical and easily ignored. Here we are seeing a noble nation being inefficively copied by a race. The real world nation being the fantasy nations thus copies are nobles and not depicted in any negative way. These orcs are thus a parody of a fantasy nation and have nothing to relate to a real world culture but to a fantasy nation inspired by a real world culture. In essence, you are saying that the fantasy cultures should be offended but they do not exist... Also, a lot of references to pop culture of the time are made, the boom box comes to mind and so are the punk references. At that time, we had a say that Punk's not dead! These orcs are a clear reference to that too... With a product that is supposed to be taken at second and even sometimes third degree, there are some that will not see what you see. This is what is highly debatable. The parody of an inspiration is not mocking the culture that inspired the nation that is parodied. Was it well executed? Nope. Can it be badly interpreted? Of course. Can it be seen in different light? Definitely. Could it have been better executed and written? Most definitely yes. This Gaz, has very little going for it. But I take it for what it is. A badly written book that did not think every aspects of its approach carefully. But I really doubt that bad intentions were in mind in the first place. I really like to think that this way of writing is past us. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
Top