Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 8493328" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>One of the main problems with Rome is that we really only have ruling-class opinions from Romans, but occasionally they, as people say today "tell on themselves" in their writing. For example, one Roman writer briefly mentions the legal requirement to massacre the slaves of anyone who got murdered by a slave of theirs, and this Roman writer is appalled, absolutely appalled that loads of working and middle class Romans (by his description) oppose this policy, and are really angry about it, and are protesting in the streets about it and making a nuisance of themselves! The implication seems to be they're too dumb to understand why this policy is needed.</p><p></p><p>Knowing humans, I suspect it's more like they didn't like it, and thought it was a bad thing. From this and other evidence, whilst I think total opposition to slavery was probably vanishingly rare in Rome, seeing it as a messed-up institution that primarily existed to benefit the rich (note that poor and middle class Romans were the ones most likely to be forced into debt slavery, of course) was probably fairly common. And even some other Roman writers seemed a bit irked by people mistreating slaves. Eventually Roman law slowly shifted to make mistreatment or murder of slaves more and more illegal.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I can't speak for the US, maybe you can go further there. In the UK? I've literally never seen a UK-made show about Rome go further than that, and even Rome got some of the "usual suspects" in the establishment moaning and whinging about how it was "unfair" and didn't adequately show the benefits of Rome.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Er... yes? Because they're the most directly affected party? I'm not sure why that's a big question? It seems pretty straightforward. It's not Americanocentric, it's looking at who is actually impacted, right now, by what's happening. It's a broadly applicable concept that doesn't just relate to America.</p><p></p><p>I mean, I think people impacted by Orientalism, particularly the treatment of Asian culture and people as "exotic", "mysterious", "desirable" (not necessarily in a good way), and so on do get to comment on what they perceived (accurately I would say in this case) Orientalsim yeah. Again not entirely sure why that would be much of a question.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Christ I didn't even think of that, nice work!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 8493328, member: 18"] One of the main problems with Rome is that we really only have ruling-class opinions from Romans, but occasionally they, as people say today "tell on themselves" in their writing. For example, one Roman writer briefly mentions the legal requirement to massacre the slaves of anyone who got murdered by a slave of theirs, and this Roman writer is appalled, absolutely appalled that loads of working and middle class Romans (by his description) oppose this policy, and are really angry about it, and are protesting in the streets about it and making a nuisance of themselves! The implication seems to be they're too dumb to understand why this policy is needed. Knowing humans, I suspect it's more like they didn't like it, and thought it was a bad thing. From this and other evidence, whilst I think total opposition to slavery was probably vanishingly rare in Rome, seeing it as a messed-up institution that primarily existed to benefit the rich (note that poor and middle class Romans were the ones most likely to be forced into debt slavery, of course) was probably fairly common. And even some other Roman writers seemed a bit irked by people mistreating slaves. Eventually Roman law slowly shifted to make mistreatment or murder of slaves more and more illegal. I can't speak for the US, maybe you can go further there. In the UK? I've literally never seen a UK-made show about Rome go further than that, and even Rome got some of the "usual suspects" in the establishment moaning and whinging about how it was "unfair" and didn't adequately show the benefits of Rome. Er... yes? Because they're the most directly affected party? I'm not sure why that's a big question? It seems pretty straightforward. It's not Americanocentric, it's looking at who is actually impacted, right now, by what's happening. It's a broadly applicable concept that doesn't just relate to America. I mean, I think people impacted by Orientalism, particularly the treatment of Asian culture and people as "exotic", "mysterious", "desirable" (not necessarily in a good way), and so on do get to comment on what they perceived (accurately I would say in this case) Orientalsim yeah. Again not entirely sure why that would be much of a question. Christ I didn't even think of that, nice work! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
Top