Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 8497766" data-attributes="member: 7023887"><p>Wow. What the hell happened to this thread? Edition wars, the old "offense is voluntary" argument (which is practically a dogwhistle version of calling someone a snowflake now), and off-topic tangents left and right.</p><p></p><p>I've seen a few people (I don't want to name names) say stuff along the lines of "I'm not aware of the context of the examples people have pointed out in the GAZ 10", or "It's not my place to judge if that's racist/bigoted", and stuff along those lines.</p><p></p><p>Yes, it is your place to judge. This Gazetteer is a part of our hobby. As members of the same hobby, it is absolutely our place to judge past works of the game, point out its problems, and apologize for this kind of content. The GAZ10's imagery was (and still is) extremely racist. Presenting Orcs in that manner was absolutely not okay, and completely puts an end to the tired-old argument of "Orcs have never been stand-ins for groups of real world peoples!" that so many "anti-woke" people love to claim. This Gazetteer proves that they were, and it was done so in a racist manner towards East Asians, Native Americans, and African Americans. To say "I don't know the context" or "it isn't my place to say whether or not that was wrong" is a cop-out and dismissing the evidence out of hand.</p><p></p><p>If you are saying "It's not my place to judge that product" or "I'm not aware of the context [while not trying to research/discover more of the context]", you're doing a cop-out and giving a free-pass to other content like this. As a member of the same community and hobby as the one that this product was made for (especially if you played the game back around the time this was released), it is absolutely your place to judge it.</p><p></p><p>It is our place to judge it. It's a part of our hobby. This product was racist. To say otherwise is either incredibly (and unbelievably) ignorant, but potentially excusing/being an apologist for this kind of racist content. If you can say "it's not my place to judge that kind of content" while talking crap about/criticizing a playstyle, edition of the game, or other D&D product that you don't like, that's extremely telling and hypocritical.</p><p></p><p>(btw, I've not just seen this kind of behavior in this thread, but also in similar discussions whether or not certain content in a variety of different contexts is racist. It's a frustratingly common and effective means to cop-out of any responsibility of using your moral judgement and empathy.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Levistus's_Leviathan, post: 8497766, member: 7023887"] Wow. What the hell happened to this thread? Edition wars, the old "offense is voluntary" argument (which is practically a dogwhistle version of calling someone a snowflake now), and off-topic tangents left and right. I've seen a few people (I don't want to name names) say stuff along the lines of "I'm not aware of the context of the examples people have pointed out in the GAZ 10", or "It's not my place to judge if that's racist/bigoted", and stuff along those lines. Yes, it is your place to judge. This Gazetteer is a part of our hobby. As members of the same hobby, it is absolutely our place to judge past works of the game, point out its problems, and apologize for this kind of content. The GAZ10's imagery was (and still is) extremely racist. Presenting Orcs in that manner was absolutely not okay, and completely puts an end to the tired-old argument of "Orcs have never been stand-ins for groups of real world peoples!" that so many "anti-woke" people love to claim. This Gazetteer proves that they were, and it was done so in a racist manner towards East Asians, Native Americans, and African Americans. To say "I don't know the context" or "it isn't my place to say whether or not that was wrong" is a cop-out and dismissing the evidence out of hand. If you are saying "It's not my place to judge that product" or "I'm not aware of the context [while not trying to research/discover more of the context]", you're doing a cop-out and giving a free-pass to other content like this. As a member of the same community and hobby as the one that this product was made for (especially if you played the game back around the time this was released), it is absolutely your place to judge it. It is our place to judge it. It's a part of our hobby. This product was racist. To say otherwise is either incredibly (and unbelievably) ignorant, but potentially excusing/being an apologist for this kind of racist content. If you can say "it's not my place to judge that kind of content" while talking crap about/criticizing a playstyle, edition of the game, or other D&D product that you don't like, that's extremely telling and hypocritical. (btw, I've not just seen this kind of behavior in this thread, but also in similar discussions whether or not certain content in a variety of different contexts is racist. It's a frustratingly common and effective means to cop-out of any responsibility of using your moral judgement and empathy.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
Top