Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 8502315" data-attributes="member: 6778210">Exactly. Disclaimers are fine for older works, but they definitely should be there, and it'd be even better to have stuff like articles explaining the problems with more nuanced problems that WOTC has continued to do to the present. In fact, you'd think they'd do that if only to explain their recent changes instead of leaving everyone on the outside trying to figure out their full intent.The bigger problem is far more from the concern-trolling that comes with the community. I see mention of "not having the proper outrage", but in all honesty so much outage comes from people being angry at changes rather than mistakes that are being made by these companies. I've seen more pearl-clutching and ridiculous hyperbole at people talking about how Wizards are killing D&D by slowly removing Alignment than anything in this thread.Even then, I'd probably recommend more modern stories that take a spin on these things. Why recommend "The Horror at Redhook" when The Ballad of Black Tom exists?But if you don't confront it, then it doesn't exist, thus we don't need to talk about it, thus nothing is wrong. Problem solved. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>