Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 8502570" data-attributes="member: 6778210">lolIf you've ever seen me in an argument, do you think I don't have the energy to deal with something like that? I hate to tell you this, but I can basically do this forever. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60f.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":sneaky:" title="Sneaky    :sneaky:"  data-smilie="21"data-shortname=":sneaky:" />  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f923.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":ROFLMAO:" title="ROFL    :ROFLMAO:"  data-smilie="18"data-shortname=":ROFLMAO:" />Whenever someone plays that, I press them. In my experience, I find them being the ones being lazy. Inevitably they want to equate my views to theirs, and I don't let that sort of thing stand.I mean, just because I'm not offended doesn't mean it's not problematic, it just doesn't hit the same notes with me as it may with others. I typically give people who find something problematic the benefit of the doubt when they are explaining things, though a bad explanation might change my mind.Changes going forward would be doing things like putting disclaimers, so I think it definitely qualifies.I don't think anything close to that has come up in this thread, and I definitely haven't seen it on my half of the arguments here at Enworld. I don't even know what "with us or against us" would be in this case. Would I be calling them racists? I don't think I've actually seen that deployed here yet.Again, I find the emotional side typically is more adamant about this sort of thing because they are viewing it emotionally. But that's just me. I don't find the sides equal precisely because of that.</blockquote>

Verification