Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justice and Rule" data-source="post: 8502749" data-attributes="member: 6778210"><p>Aww, I'm sorry.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, but you can also make them to absolutely fulfill your argument while not actually reflecting real life. I can make up a hypothetical about someone being offended by anything, but that doesn't mean that it is actually germane to our conversation.</p><p></p><p>If you can't actually come up with real-life examples and defend them, then I just don't see why we don't use them. If you want to faff around with useless imaginary situations instead of actually addressing the real-life situation, then I really don't care. Go create a thread of weird hypotheticals. We have plenty of real situations to draw from here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, because these situations are <strong><em>specifically contextually based, </em></strong>hence why hypotheticals are not useful. You can make hypotheticals that contextualize around anything and everything, but we have actual situations we are talking about right now that we can actually look at. Trying to figure out a magical set of rules that applies to everything misses that what we are talking about are almost always extremely situational and will rely on the specifics to dictate the intensity of the solution.</p><p></p><p>So yeah, I just don't care about whatever situation you want to make up. We don't need to figure an extensive flow-chart to dictate our response. We can come up with it individually because each situation will be individual.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Those aren't arguments against a disclaimer, those are arguments about doing disclaimers <em><strong>badly</strong></em>. Those are not the same.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justice and Rule, post: 8502749, member: 6778210"] Aww, I'm sorry. Yes, but you can also make them to absolutely fulfill your argument while not actually reflecting real life. I can make up a hypothetical about someone being offended by anything, but that doesn't mean that it is actually germane to our conversation. If you can't actually come up with real-life examples and defend them, then I just don't see why we don't use them. If you want to faff around with useless imaginary situations instead of actually addressing the real-life situation, then I really don't care. Go create a thread of weird hypotheticals. We have plenty of real situations to draw from here. No, because these situations are [B][I]specifically contextually based, [/I][/B]hence why hypotheticals are not useful. You can make hypotheticals that contextualize around anything and everything, but we have actual situations we are talking about right now that we can actually look at. Trying to figure out a magical set of rules that applies to everything misses that what we are talking about are almost always extremely situational and will rely on the specifics to dictate the intensity of the solution. So yeah, I just don't care about whatever situation you want to make up. We don't need to figure an extensive flow-chart to dictate our response. We can come up with it individually because each situation will be individual. Those aren't arguments against a disclaimer, those are arguments about doing disclaimers [I][B]badly[/B][/I]. Those are not the same. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
Top