Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 8505095" data-attributes="member: 6915329"><p>And yet the trend continued in 2e, which included Habitat/Society and Ecology sections. And in Dragon magazines, which had articles (e.g., Half-Orcs, in #62, and The Humanoids, in #63, both by Roger Moore for 1e; despite the title, Half-Orcs is more about orcs than half-orcs) where they had <em>plenty </em>of room to go into their society--and they used that room to talk about how awful they are.</p><p></p><p>If they had wanted the humanoids to be not always evil, I'm they would have thought to write that. You don't need to write a dissertation on it. You need one sentence, maybe two. In modern parlance, all you need is a hash tag. After all, the 1e MM included a fair number of good and neutral monsters who <em>weren't </em>supposed to be used to challenge and fight PCs. </p><p></p><p>In the Half-Orcs article above, Moore talks about how even half-orcs raised by humans are only occasionally going to be neutral or, more rarely, good, but will be "unnaturally" (by human standards) Lawful, because back in 1e, orcs were LE, not CE.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, it does apply to those arguments, very much so. Because no matter what <em>you</em>, as a DM, may decide, the books themselves show that the game expected orcs, goblins, etc., to be entirely evil, with <em>maybe </em>an exception. And "this orc is OK, he's a <em>good </em>orc," is <em>not </em>a neat counter at all. </p><p></p><p>And anyway, even if and when the MMs blatantly say "not all whatevers need to be this alignment," that only actually <em>means </em>something if the books actually <em>show </em>this to be true, and not just as that one exception. Heck, skipping editions, Obould Many-Arrows: uniter of his peoples, broker of peace treaties, willing to put his own anger aside to form important alliances. <em>Chaotic </em>Evil. Not even Lawful! In 3x, when orcs were only <em>"often"</em> Chaotic Evil, they wouldn't change this one orc's alignment to even Lawful Evil.</p><p></p><p><em>That </em>is why saying that the exceptions counter the arguments.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 8505095, member: 6915329"] And yet the trend continued in 2e, which included Habitat/Society and Ecology sections. And in Dragon magazines, which had articles (e.g., Half-Orcs, in #62, and The Humanoids, in #63, both by Roger Moore for 1e; despite the title, Half-Orcs is more about orcs than half-orcs) where they had [I]plenty [/I]of room to go into their society--and they used that room to talk about how awful they are. If they had wanted the humanoids to be not always evil, I'm they would have thought to write that. You don't need to write a dissertation on it. You need one sentence, maybe two. In modern parlance, all you need is a hash tag. After all, the 1e MM included a fair number of good and neutral monsters who [I]weren't [/I]supposed to be used to challenge and fight PCs. In the Half-Orcs article above, Moore talks about how even half-orcs raised by humans are only occasionally going to be neutral or, more rarely, good, but will be "unnaturally" (by human standards) Lawful, because back in 1e, orcs were LE, not CE. Yes, it does apply to those arguments, very much so. Because no matter what [I]you[/I], as a DM, may decide, the books themselves show that the game expected orcs, goblins, etc., to be entirely evil, with [I]maybe [/I]an exception. And "this orc is OK, he's a [I]good [/I]orc," is [I]not [/I]a neat counter at all. And anyway, even if and when the MMs blatantly say "not all whatevers need to be this alignment," that only actually [I]means [/I]something if the books actually [I]show [/I]this to be true, and not just as that one exception. Heck, skipping editions, Obould Many-Arrows: uniter of his peoples, broker of peace treaties, willing to put his own anger aside to form important alliances. [I]Chaotic [/I]Evil. Not even Lawful! In 3x, when orcs were only [I]"often"[/I] Chaotic Evil, they wouldn't change this one orc's alignment to even Lawful Evil. [I]That [/I]is why saying that the exceptions counter the arguments. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
Top