Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scars Unseen" data-source="post: 8506661" data-attributes="member: 10196"><p>I'm not a fan of those options either, and I don't think D&D can fully embrace either and retain the level of popularity it has reached so far. The former would fly in the face of one of D&D's bigger strengths: that by not being explicitly beholden to any one setting, it makes for a decent starting point for any number of settings, most notably including custom ones for each gaming group. The latter would just be a repeat of the mistake WotC made with 4E: keeping settings in name only while actively demolishing everything that made them what they were. They've already done a good job of ensuring that the best setting material to draw from is decades old books they didn't publish. It'd be a shame to do the same with entire core elements of the game itself.</p><p></p><p>In all honesty, the best thing they could do IMO is keep to your "default + exception" format, but instead of books with those exceptions, lean <em>hard</em> into reviving the old Monster Ecologies format for Dragon+ and then publish digital compendiums on an annual basis, with print on demand for those who want a physical version. And throughout that, they can revise old monsters and races where necessary and flesh out new ones as they're created.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scars Unseen, post: 8506661, member: 10196"] I'm not a fan of those options either, and I don't think D&D can fully embrace either and retain the level of popularity it has reached so far. The former would fly in the face of one of D&D's bigger strengths: that by not being explicitly beholden to any one setting, it makes for a decent starting point for any number of settings, most notably including custom ones for each gaming group. The latter would just be a repeat of the mistake WotC made with 4E: keeping settings in name only while actively demolishing everything that made them what they were. They've already done a good job of ensuring that the best setting material to draw from is decades old books they didn't publish. It'd be a shame to do the same with entire core elements of the game itself. In all honesty, the best thing they could do IMO is keep to your "default + exception" format, but instead of books with those exceptions, lean [I]hard[/I] into reviving the old Monster Ecologies format for Dragon+ and then publish digital compendiums on an annual basis, with print on demand for those who want a physical version. And throughout that, they can revise old monsters and races where necessary and flesh out new ones as they're created. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"Red Orc" American Indians and "Yellow Orc" Mongolians in D&D
Top