Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Monte At Home" data-source="post: 36959" data-attributes="member: 1335">Top Ten ListsI think that you should either adopt a system like CRGreathouse suggests, or you should drop the top and bottom 10 lists altogether. Currently, they are deceptive because they don't include all the products. Before, they were deceptive because people could (and by appearances, were) spiking ratings with good or bad reviews just to alter the top 10 lists.I wouldn't weight reviewers differently I don't think. I certainly wouldn't base it on number of reviews done--it encourages people do a lot of reviews, but not necessarily good reviews.You could (although this would be complex) have people rate how useful they felt various reviews were, and then weight reviews based on previous reviewer ratings, but I don't think that's necessary.Mostly, I think that if you're going to have a site where anyone can come along and review any product, you should treat all the reviewers the same.I like very much that the recent reviews are listed, and that you can click on publishers.</blockquote>