Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Reduced Magic Item Prevalence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Brother MacLaren" data-source="post: 3772954" data-attributes="member: 15999"><p>The problem is the arms race aspect of the game.</p><p></p><p>If a fighter has a better Will save progression, such that he has a 60% chance of making his Will save against an effect he's likely to face at his level, players will seek to boost that to 90%. If there is any magical way to increase it, they'll want to buy, craft, or steal such an item, or badger their party casters to pick up that spell and use it. </p><p></p><p>Then the game designers will realize that the Will save DCs in the core MM are too easy for many games, and they'll seek to increase them in future Monster Manuals to account for these magical effects. That leaves the fighters without the magical effects stuck. The magical effects now become essential to survive.</p><p></p><p>Basic/Expert fixed this by simply having a very limited spell list, a very limited magic item list, few stacking modifiers, no magic stores, and difficult magic item creation. You got what you found and that was it. There were hard limits. You couldn't get Str past 18, and you couldn't get AC below -10 (above 30 in d20 terms).</p><p></p><p>But once you give the PCs expanded options and freedom, the problem escalates. Some designer, somewhere, is GOING to say "Hey, wouldn't fighters like a magic item that lets them make Will saves more often?" Only by HEAVILY increasing the cost/benefit ratio of this item could you slow down the arms race.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Brother MacLaren, post: 3772954, member: 15999"] The problem is the arms race aspect of the game. If a fighter has a better Will save progression, such that he has a 60% chance of making his Will save against an effect he's likely to face at his level, players will seek to boost that to 90%. If there is any magical way to increase it, they'll want to buy, craft, or steal such an item, or badger their party casters to pick up that spell and use it. Then the game designers will realize that the Will save DCs in the core MM are too easy for many games, and they'll seek to increase them in future Monster Manuals to account for these magical effects. That leaves the fighters without the magical effects stuck. The magical effects now become essential to survive. Basic/Expert fixed this by simply having a very limited spell list, a very limited magic item list, few stacking modifiers, no magic stores, and difficult magic item creation. You got what you found and that was it. There were hard limits. You couldn't get Str past 18, and you couldn't get AC below -10 (above 30 in d20 terms). But once you give the PCs expanded options and freedom, the problem escalates. Some designer, somewhere, is GOING to say "Hey, wouldn't fighters like a magic item that lets them make Will saves more often?" Only by HEAVILY increasing the cost/benefit ratio of this item could you slow down the arms race. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Reduced Magic Item Prevalence
Top