Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Referendum on AD&D 2e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nisarg" data-source="post: 1783422" data-attributes="member: 19893"><p>No, its basic theory of poll design. Anyone who works at a polling firm would tell you the same thing.. the question asked in this poll was analogous to asking "would you vote for the Blue party if they had good politicians in it?"</p><p>When the pollee thinks of "good politicians" he'll think of his definition of a good political figure, and memories of particular politicians he admired will come to mind. In other words, its a very leading question, and one that often betrays fundamental mistrust in a party.</p><p></p><p>To give a real world example (and I hope this doesn't get considered political discussion): before Kerry was picked for pres. candidate, there were a number of polls made, pitting each of the 9 or so Dem candidates against Bush in popularity. They all failed against him in those polls, he beat them all. But when an "unnamed democrat" ran against Bush, Bush lost bad. Why was that? </p><p>The polling firms concluded from this information that there was a serious current of dissent against the Bush presidency, but at the same time a serious distrust of the democratic candidates. People voted against bush vs. the "unnamed democrat" because they imagined that "unnamed democrat" in their mind to be John F. Kennedy or Bill Clinton or who ever their favourite democratic president was.</p><p></p><p>So, bringing it back to the question of our poll in this thread, it may be true that you're a highly atypical human being who wasn't thinking of a particularly great DM when you answered the supposedly "middle" answer to the question. But the average person who answered that question was very much thinking that they'd play 2nd edition if it had a really good DM (and were thinking of a particular DM they liked while doing it), who would overcome their DISLIKE of 2e. Otherwise, they'd have answered the with the third "I'd love to" answer... that's the answer chosen by the minority 20% who liked 2e in and of itself, and did not require some kind of "push polling" to get them to vote favourably.</p><p></p><p>Nisarg</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nisarg, post: 1783422, member: 19893"] No, its basic theory of poll design. Anyone who works at a polling firm would tell you the same thing.. the question asked in this poll was analogous to asking "would you vote for the Blue party if they had good politicians in it?" When the pollee thinks of "good politicians" he'll think of his definition of a good political figure, and memories of particular politicians he admired will come to mind. In other words, its a very leading question, and one that often betrays fundamental mistrust in a party. To give a real world example (and I hope this doesn't get considered political discussion): before Kerry was picked for pres. candidate, there were a number of polls made, pitting each of the 9 or so Dem candidates against Bush in popularity. They all failed against him in those polls, he beat them all. But when an "unnamed democrat" ran against Bush, Bush lost bad. Why was that? The polling firms concluded from this information that there was a serious current of dissent against the Bush presidency, but at the same time a serious distrust of the democratic candidates. People voted against bush vs. the "unnamed democrat" because they imagined that "unnamed democrat" in their mind to be John F. Kennedy or Bill Clinton or who ever their favourite democratic president was. So, bringing it back to the question of our poll in this thread, it may be true that you're a highly atypical human being who wasn't thinking of a particularly great DM when you answered the supposedly "middle" answer to the question. But the average person who answered that question was very much thinking that they'd play 2nd edition if it had a really good DM (and were thinking of a particular DM they liked while doing it), who would overcome their DISLIKE of 2e. Otherwise, they'd have answered the with the third "I'd love to" answer... that's the answer chosen by the minority 20% who liked 2e in and of itself, and did not require some kind of "push polling" to get them to vote favourably. Nisarg [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Referendum on AD&D 2e
Top