Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ro" data-source="post: 7234933" data-attributes="member: 6890747">What do you think of replacing, at least for feats, Expertise = double proficiency with Expertise = advantage?I thought about this, too. I see two distinct roles for these feats. Dungeon Delver is about overcoming physical obstacles (MacGuyver). Skulker is about being sneaky (Gollum). They both have a great place in the game if they can be strengthened.\Furthermore--and this is something to really think about--keeping them separate gives two feats for the dungeon expert rather than one. If a character has to take multiple feats to truly become the best of the best at something, I think that is a cool idea. Keeping these separate creates multiple attractive avenues of expanding an exploration-focused character. Perhaps it would be ideal to have a pair or trio of feats for a number of character types: type-of-ranged fighter, type-of-melee fighter, some-type-of caster, exploration expert, etc.In general I don't like either Keen Mind or Observant, though there are occasional combinations that make them somewhat useful. As all of their included benefits are mostly ribbons, I don't think merging them is particularly helpful. Also, thematically they are somewhat different. I would rather get rid of both and put them elsewhere.Healer is good, but it isn't taken particularly frequently and seems wasted on Clerics and other magical healers. It's almost like a backup feat, "Oh no! We don't have a healer! Somebody take the feat!"Most feats help characters who are already good at something to be even better, and that's the direction I feel Healer should go. Making the Medicine skill more useful would be a nice plus.</blockquote>

Verification