Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Coredump" data-source="post: 6779150" data-attributes="member: 6939">The Glaive into Spear refluff is an interesting situation.&nbsp; There are *very* few situations in the game when piercing vs slashing makes a mechanical difference. Plus, most weapons damage type is their typical primary damage type. For example, a glaive does piercing damage also, but primarily slashing.So, I would advise one of the two:1) You not have a 'longspear', it is a reach weapon that does 1D10 damage, but *your* style is less stabby-stabby and more using the tip to cut and gouge.... basically, you are using your spear to do slashing damage. (so, just refluffing the glaive)2) You have a longspear, it is a reach weapon that does 1D10 damage. You stab people with it all the time, you 'run them through' you 'brace for the charge' etc.&nbsp; But.....&nbsp; you (and the DM) realize that 3% of the time you need to remember that it is 'really' doing slashing and not piercing damage.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Coredump, post: 6779150, member: 6939"] The Glaive into Spear refluff is an interesting situation. There are *very* few situations in the game when piercing vs slashing makes a mechanical difference. Plus, most weapons damage type is their typical primary damage type. For example, a glaive does piercing damage also, but primarily slashing. So, I would advise one of the two: 1) You not have a 'longspear', it is a reach weapon that does 1D10 damage, but *your* style is less stabby-stabby and more using the tip to cut and gouge.... basically, you are using your spear to do slashing damage. (so, just refluffing the glaive) 2) You have a longspear, it is a reach weapon that does 1D10 damage. You stab people with it all the time, you 'run them through' you 'brace for the charge' etc. But..... you (and the DM) realize that 3% of the time you need to remember that it is 'really' doing slashing and not piercing damage. [/QUOTE]

Verification