Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Regarding the complexity of Pathfinder 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8098566" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Again, spot on, Puggins!</p><p></p><p>Also note the three-trunked elephant in the room:</p><p></p><p>a) against any monster dangerous enough that Recalling Knowledge feels critical, you have less than a 50% chance of getting something out of a Recall Knowledge action. And I hope everybody agrees that for many monsters, a single "prominent fact" isn't enough to "solve" the puzzle that is said monster.</p><p></p><p>b) personally, I feel monsters are so dangerous in this game that even when I hand out a free monster knowledge check at the start of each combat, and hand out most pertinent info already on a single success, the monsters are <strong><em>still</em></strong> very dangerous and very challenging.</p><p></p><p>and last but not least...</p><p></p><p>c) The opportunity cost. Each action spent on Recall Knowledge is 100% guaranteed an action that does not deal any damage, it hands out exactly zero buffs, and it is sure to debuff absolutely no enemy! The opportunity cost here is that just attacking is often sufficient to learn what you need to know. Even if you deal 15 damage less because of a vulnerability... you learnt that fact automatically for free while still (hopefully) dealing at least some damage.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>Running Recall Knowledge as I think I understand the RAW wants it to be run feels... overwhelming, unnecessary and like a hard difficulty upgrade.</p><p></p><p>No hero has time to spend more than maybe a single action on recalling knowledge when they're busy saving their own life. Even with five players, five such actions feels entirely insufficient to actually learn what you need to know.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>My point with c) is that in isolation an action spent on Recall Knowledge might seem like a fair deal. But when you factor in that this is not an action spent on actual combat, the total cost becomes overwhelmingly high in our opinion. Most combats are decided within three rounds. Spending even 1/9th on possibly failing to learn even a single thing is severely overcosted in my analysis. (It actually is worse, since you really need that information in the first round - and ideally before your melee bruisers act too! - for it to really matter)</p><p></p><p>Since the average cost of learning even a single thing is (more than) two actions, the result is that optimizing players simply learn about their foes the hard way, completely ignoring Recall Knowledge (until you get feats and spells that hand out checks for free).</p><p></p><p>Faced with that reality (and agreeing with the cost analysis) I started playing exactly the same way I'm playing 5th Edition: at the start of each encounter every player gets a free monster knowledge check, and even one success tells the party what they need to know. Much simpler for me, much more satisfying fun for the players - and combats are still plenty difficult, so noone feels anything of value is lost! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>If I have to constructively offer up a variant rule that retains as much of the Recall Knowledge structure as possible, I probably would go for:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">You can make a Recall Knowledge check for free if and only if you take the basic Strike action. MAP applies to this RK check.</p><p></p><p>That is, the cost is now that you can't do your class-specific cool special attacks. But you still get to accomplish <em>something</em> even when attempting a RK check. There is a cost (the difference between a "cool" attack and a "boring" one), but it is much more in line with the benefits. The MAP penalty ensures that spamming these checks is a losing proposition. (If you take something like the <a href="https://2e.aonprd.com/Feats.aspx?ID=498" target="_blank">Quick Draw</a> action, you get a Strike as part of that action, but since you aren't taking the basic Strike action, no free RK check for you)</p><p></p><p>For spellcasters this becomes</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">You can make a Recall Knowledge check for free with every cantrip you cast to attack the creature you're attempting to recall info about.</p><p></p><p>That is, as long as you coast along with your cantrips (instead of letting loose with a slotted spell) you too get to contribute to the recall knowledge game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 8098566, member: 12731"] Again, spot on, Puggins! Also note the three-trunked elephant in the room: a) against any monster dangerous enough that Recalling Knowledge feels critical, you have less than a 50% chance of getting something out of a Recall Knowledge action. And I hope everybody agrees that for many monsters, a single "prominent fact" isn't enough to "solve" the puzzle that is said monster. b) personally, I feel monsters are so dangerous in this game that even when I hand out a free monster knowledge check at the start of each combat, and hand out most pertinent info already on a single success, the monsters are [B][I]still[/I][/B] very dangerous and very challenging. and last but not least... c) The opportunity cost. Each action spent on Recall Knowledge is 100% guaranteed an action that does not deal any damage, it hands out exactly zero buffs, and it is sure to debuff absolutely no enemy! The opportunity cost here is that just attacking is often sufficient to learn what you need to know. Even if you deal 15 damage less because of a vulnerability... you learnt that fact automatically for free while still (hopefully) dealing at least some damage. --- Running Recall Knowledge as I think I understand the RAW wants it to be run feels... overwhelming, unnecessary and like a hard difficulty upgrade. No hero has time to spend more than maybe a single action on recalling knowledge when they're busy saving their own life. Even with five players, five such actions feels entirely insufficient to actually learn what you need to know. --- My point with c) is that in isolation an action spent on Recall Knowledge might seem like a fair deal. But when you factor in that this is not an action spent on actual combat, the total cost becomes overwhelmingly high in our opinion. Most combats are decided within three rounds. Spending even 1/9th on possibly failing to learn even a single thing is severely overcosted in my analysis. (It actually is worse, since you really need that information in the first round - and ideally before your melee bruisers act too! - for it to really matter) Since the average cost of learning even a single thing is (more than) two actions, the result is that optimizing players simply learn about their foes the hard way, completely ignoring Recall Knowledge (until you get feats and spells that hand out checks for free). Faced with that reality (and agreeing with the cost analysis) I started playing exactly the same way I'm playing 5th Edition: at the start of each encounter every player gets a free monster knowledge check, and even one success tells the party what they need to know. Much simpler for me, much more satisfying fun for the players - and combats are still plenty difficult, so noone feels anything of value is lost! :) --- If I have to constructively offer up a variant rule that retains as much of the Recall Knowledge structure as possible, I probably would go for: [INDENT]You can make a Recall Knowledge check for free if and only if you take the basic Strike action. MAP applies to this RK check.[/INDENT] That is, the cost is now that you can't do your class-specific cool special attacks. But you still get to accomplish [I]something[/I] even when attempting a RK check. There is a cost (the difference between a "cool" attack and a "boring" one), but it is much more in line with the benefits. The MAP penalty ensures that spamming these checks is a losing proposition. (If you take something like the [URL='https://2e.aonprd.com/Feats.aspx?ID=498']Quick Draw[/URL] action, you get a Strike as part of that action, but since you aren't taking the basic Strike action, no free RK check for you) For spellcasters this becomes [INDENT]You can make a Recall Knowledge check for free with every cantrip you cast to attack the creature you're attempting to recall info about.[/INDENT] That is, as long as you coast along with your cantrips (instead of letting loose with a slotted spell) you too get to contribute to the recall knowledge game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Regarding the complexity of Pathfinder 2
Top