Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 8101541" data-attributes="member: 12731">No, now you're discussing only the Recall Knowledge activity in isolation. Please don't do that.I am discussing Recall Knowledge in full context, including every related bit and bob of rules minutae. (If you aren't content to wait until the problem comes to you, you can do what I did, a text search in the CRB PDF). This includes feats like <a href="https://2e.aonprd.com/Feats.aspx?ID=757" target="_blank">Automatic Knowledge</a> and spells like <a href="https://2e.aonprd.com/Spells.aspx?ID=156" target="_blank">Hypercognition</a> and even whole classes like the Investigator. I don't know what to make of it, or how to use it in actual play, despite considering my level of GM experience as &quot;very&quot;. That's a problem in my book.For more, I've participated in a thread where I constructively offer solutions:[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.enworld.org/threads/fixing-improving-recall-knowledge.668044/[/URL]&quot;working as intended&quot; is not a good defense unless my criticism was &quot;it tried to make it hard to break WBL and it fails&quot;. I'm not criticizing the end result as much as the process.Let me quote myself from the thread where I constructively suggest a replacement rule:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 8101541, member: 12731"] No, now you're discussing only the Recall Knowledge activity in isolation. Please don't do that. I am discussing Recall Knowledge in full context, including every related bit and bob of rules minutae. (If you aren't content to wait until the problem comes to you, you can do what I did, a text search in the CRB PDF). This includes feats like [URL='https://2e.aonprd.com/Feats.aspx?ID=757']Automatic Knowledge[/URL] and spells like [URL='https://2e.aonprd.com/Spells.aspx?ID=156']Hypercognition[/URL] and even whole classes like the Investigator. I don't know what to make of it, or how to use it in actual play, despite considering my level of GM experience as "very". That's a problem in my book. For more, I've participated in a thread where I constructively offer solutions: [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.enworld.org/threads/fixing-improving-recall-knowledge.668044/[/URL] "working as intended" is not a good defense unless my criticism was "it tried to make it hard to break WBL and it fails". I'm not criticizing the end result as much as the process. Let me quote myself from the thread where I constructively suggest a replacement rule: [/QUOTE]

Verification