Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kenada" data-source="post: 8148276" data-attributes="member: 70468">Is this the thread that started with a pitch for a GoT-ish D&amp;D campaign? I think I have my two cents there and haven’t really looked back.For my setting, the <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/r6xpdcjwrdfby2y/Entira%20-%20World%20Guide.pdf" target="_blank">ancestries</a> that are available are what’s available. There is some influence from past campaigns and what players did, and I have changed one (vuple) to align more with what the player wanted from the ancestry. I provisionally have allowed some core options (see below), but the answer is generally no.I don’t allow any Lost Omens content. I provisionally allow some core content. You can be a yuma or elven half-orc, and flexible heritages are allowed for most ancestries. There are a few core ancestries (goblins, kobolds, orcs) I have considered adapting, but it would take some work, and my backlog is already big enough.The setting got its start when I was running Open Legend. Since that is a generic system, I was free to do whatever—had to do whatever. It reflects a lot of influence from JRPGs (particularly FF XIV) as well as Sanderson (Stormlight Archive), Vance (Dying Earth, particularly Rhialto the Marvellous), and mecha anime (Simoun, some Darling in the Franxx). It’s also worth mentioning Konosuba!&nbsp; for its influence on yuman religion.I’m working on a revision to my ancestries that drops ability flaws. I think Paizo should have done the same for PF2. It a throwback that’s unnecessary. You can build around it, but it feels needlessly punitive.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="kenada, post: 8148276, member: 70468"] Is this the thread that started with a pitch for a GoT-ish D&D campaign? I think I have my two cents there and haven’t really looked back. For my setting, the [URL='https://www.dropbox.com/s/r6xpdcjwrdfby2y/Entira%20-%20World%20Guide.pdf']ancestries[/URL] that are available are what’s available. There is some influence from past campaigns and what players did, and I have changed one (vuple) to align more with what the player wanted from the ancestry. I provisionally have allowed some core options (see below), but the answer is generally no. I don’t allow any Lost Omens content. I provisionally allow some core content. You can be a yuma or elven half-orc, and flexible heritages are allowed for most ancestries. There are a few core ancestries (goblins, kobolds, orcs) I have considered adapting, but it would take some work, and my backlog is already big enough. The setting got its start when I was running Open Legend. Since that is a generic system, I was free to do whatever—had to do whatever. It reflects a lot of influence from JRPGs (particularly FF XIV) as well as Sanderson (Stormlight Archive), Vance (Dying Earth, particularly [I]Rhialto the Marvellous[/I]), and mecha anime ([I]Simoun[/I], some [I]Darling in the Franxx[/I]). It’s also worth mentioning [I]Konosuba![/I] for its influence on yuman religion. I’m working on a revision to my ancestries that drops ability flaws. I think Paizo should have done the same for PF2. It a throwback that’s unnecessary. You can build around it, but it feels needlessly punitive. [/QUOTE]

Verification