Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="kenada" data-source="post: 8156543" data-attributes="member: 70468">You’re framing this like you’re doing us a favor, and you’ve chastised us for being obstinate. Do you think a “public service announcement” is going to be uncritically received in a forum for that game? What kind of reaction did you expect?<a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/regarding-the-complexity-of-pathfinder-2.675063/post-8131524" target="_blank">I tried to understand the core of the argument</a>, but that got no traction. We’ve instead gone around and around in circles over minutia. Moreover, when a particular issue affects only a certain style, we get reminded that what you actually mean is a very narrow style of play: a kick-in-the-door campaign running official adventures running everything 100% by the book. If you mean that, then you should say that instead of keeping it in reserve as a way to move the goalposts when someone offers a counter-point or argument.I’m flabbergasted. This is a farce. You are literally saying we are wrong in our beliefs about a game. For what? Because we view it differently, enjoy it differently, or don’t consider the things you identify as problems as actual problems or even consider them desirable traits or virtues? Poor us. Having our bad wrong fun because we just don’t understand how much better that thing we’re doing could have been.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="kenada, post: 8156543, member: 70468"] You’re framing this like you’re doing us a favor, and you’ve chastised us for being obstinate. Do you think a “public service announcement” is going to be uncritically received in a forum for that game? What kind of reaction did you expect? [URL='https://www.enworld.org/threads/regarding-the-complexity-of-pathfinder-2.675063/post-8131524']I tried to understand the core of the argument[/URL], but that got no traction. We’ve instead gone around and around in circles over minutia. Moreover, when a particular issue affects only a certain style, we get reminded that what you actually mean is a very narrow style of play: a kick-in-the-door campaign running official adventures running everything 100% by the book. If you mean that, then you should say that instead of keeping it in reserve as a way to move the goalposts when someone offers a counter-point or argument. I’m flabbergasted. This is a farce. You are literally saying we are wrong in our beliefs about a game. For what? Because we view it differently, enjoy it differently, or don’t consider the things you identify as problems as actual problems or even consider them desirable traits or virtues? Poor us. Having our bad wrong fun because we just don’t understand how much better that thing we’re doing could have been. [/QUOTE]

Verification