Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Regarding the (supposed) lack of role-playing in 4E
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SweeneyTodd" data-source="post: 4316425" data-attributes="member: 9391"><p>Sorry, I disagree. I think that your interpretation is colored by your personal opinion. It's perfectly possible to roleplay with description and dialog while also using the mechanics ... at the same time. </p><p></p><p>It's cool if you don't want to do that, and would rather "just roleplay" and have the mechanics not be used, but that's just opinion. </p><p></p><p>It's a roleplaying game. The mechanics are there to be invoked when desired. Simply playing the mechanics "flat", without any imagined context, is not going to be an entertaining game, no matter which game it is.</p><p></p><p>"I convince him."</p><p>"Roll Diplomacy."</p><p>"...18."</p><p>"He's convinced"</p><p></p><p>Is not how the game's written to be played. That's ignoring the <em>why</em> and just doing the how. Apart from some bad con/demo games, you're not going to see it, and if you do, hey, good time to walk away from the table. You're welcome to the opinion, but reading the books didn't give me the impression that that is the intended style of play <em>at all</em>. (For one thing, it doesn't match the examples given.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm pretty confused by this. Are you saying they should have done this, but didn't?</p><p></p><p>Reading the entire PHB and DMG (yes, even the introduction) made it really clear to me that it's a game where you play a fictional character, and that the rules are there to help you do that, not to <em>replace</em> doing that. </p><p></p><p>The idea that "Any roll you're making has to do with some action your character is taking; you should actually describe that action" is totally consistent with the rules as published, and the examples of play given. Obviously you're not supposed to say "I roll athletics to cross the rickety bridge", you're supposed to say "I cross the rickety bridge" (with whatever additional detail you the player would like to add), and then roll to determine the outcome of that action.</p><p></p><p>A naked roll, with no context in the shared imagined space, isn't an action. It isn't anything. It's not play! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>(Realistically I know you can totally have a "naked roll", in that situation your action is implied and the folks at the table know what you meant to do, or else the DM just asks you to clarify. The level of description that's "good enough" is gonna differ for each gaming group. And I think that's a good thing -- the rules could say "You must stand and announce your action in an Olde English accent and say Verily a lot", but what would that accomplish? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SweeneyTodd, post: 4316425, member: 9391"] Sorry, I disagree. I think that your interpretation is colored by your personal opinion. It's perfectly possible to roleplay with description and dialog while also using the mechanics ... at the same time. It's cool if you don't want to do that, and would rather "just roleplay" and have the mechanics not be used, but that's just opinion. It's a roleplaying game. The mechanics are there to be invoked when desired. Simply playing the mechanics "flat", without any imagined context, is not going to be an entertaining game, no matter which game it is. "I convince him." "Roll Diplomacy." "...18." "He's convinced" Is not how the game's written to be played. That's ignoring the [i]why[/i] and just doing the how. Apart from some bad con/demo games, you're not going to see it, and if you do, hey, good time to walk away from the table. You're welcome to the opinion, but reading the books didn't give me the impression that that is the intended style of play [i]at all[/i]. (For one thing, it doesn't match the examples given.) I'm pretty confused by this. Are you saying they should have done this, but didn't? Reading the entire PHB and DMG (yes, even the introduction) made it really clear to me that it's a game where you play a fictional character, and that the rules are there to help you do that, not to [i]replace[/i] doing that. The idea that "Any roll you're making has to do with some action your character is taking; you should actually describe that action" is totally consistent with the rules as published, and the examples of play given. Obviously you're not supposed to say "I roll athletics to cross the rickety bridge", you're supposed to say "I cross the rickety bridge" (with whatever additional detail you the player would like to add), and then roll to determine the outcome of that action. A naked roll, with no context in the shared imagined space, isn't an action. It isn't anything. It's not play! :) (Realistically I know you can totally have a "naked roll", in that situation your action is implied and the folks at the table know what you meant to do, or else the DM just asks you to clarify. The level of description that's "good enough" is gonna differ for each gaming group. And I think that's a good thing -- the rules could say "You must stand and announce your action in an Olde English accent and say Verily a lot", but what would that accomplish? :) ) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Regarding the (supposed) lack of role-playing in 4E
Top