Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="RenZhe" data-source="post: 6793866" data-attributes="member: 6802115">I would not say that that is a good build which promotes your case. You've spent all of your feats getting warlord powers and class features AND you've spent your turn 1 opening kata doing performing what was wholly a leader function (you could counter-argue that you did mark, but you just set your party striker on the target and gave him a free crit, so that mark is of dubious utility), which begs the question, why are you playing a fighter over a warlord in the first place? Contrast vs a fighter who actually uses CaGI + Glowering Threat as his opening kata and actually fulfilling the needs of his role.A much better build justification would be Dragonborn Fighter/PMC Warlord.Open with Tactical Orders + Death from Two Sides, then Dragonfear + Baleful Glance. You leadstrike a primary target, then mass-mark and debuff a field of others, including a daze on two of them. In this case, running this on a full fighter chassis would be much more justified as you can actually mass-mark with dragonfear.A successful PMC should really be held to the same standard as a hybrid - you have to either gain by being better at your primary job (e.g. Mia), or you have to perform at least 80% on both your intended roles. Your case is more like a 55-55% that's also down 3 feats.</blockquote>