Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Herzog" data-source="post: 4743225" data-attributes="member: 25696">I just read the thread, since I searched for threads on Reincarnation before starting a new one. (for those now searching for the search function and not finding one: you need to pay for it. I payed, therefore I search.)The problem with that thread (and some other ones I found that brushed the subject) was that one or two people in that discussion kept to their reading of the text, regardless whether they agreed on the intent of the text or not.Because that is a discussion that can only be stopped by 'agree to disagree', and such a discussion will go on and on until both parties do, I didn't want it repeated here. Hence the request.Note that other discussions on these boards have followed a similar pattern, like the one about one or two attacks of oppertunity on a ranged touch spell. In that particular discussion, it was even two posters that agreed on the rule-effect of the RAW,  but disagreed on why the RAW resulted in the effect.Pointless (IMO) discussion from a players point of view, but an indication why rules discussions on these boards can really drag on <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>