Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Releasing a (held) touch spell on yourself?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aberzanzorax" data-source="post: 5650548" data-attributes="member: 64209"><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I agree he'd physically have to touch himself (e.g. if he failed a save versus hold person rather than a flame strike, he would not later be able to use a held spell on himself while paralyzed).</p><p> </p><p>There is no action sequence where he would have ended up alive (unless he was already injured prior to the flame strike and the hp restored were to bring him up higher).</p><p> </p><p>Instantaneous damage is just that, instantaneous. So basically, even assuming he knew he'd want to do it, he either has to touch himself before the damage occurs (doing nothing if he's undamaged) or has to do so after he is dead (doing nothing if he's dead).</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>But then it gets even weirder.</p><p> </p><p>What if he was holding "raise dead"? Could he touch himself and raise himself when he fell? He'd have to be dead for it to work, and if he were dead it would have discharged because he'd no longer be concentrating upon it.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>In terms of being able to touch himself without taking an action, it seems to fall under the lines of "attack of opportunity" or "quickened spell" usage, or even "drop to the floor" action.</p><p> </p><p>On the other hand:</p><p> </p><p></p><p>It seems that it requires a standard action to touch a friend, but that it is automatic. I'm not sure what that means for this conversation, other than that you couldn't miss the lich and then touch a friend in the same round...but you could if it was an attack of opportunity?</p><p> </p><p>I've confused myself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aberzanzorax, post: 5650548, member: 64209"] [B][/B] I agree he'd physically have to touch himself (e.g. if he failed a save versus hold person rather than a flame strike, he would not later be able to use a held spell on himself while paralyzed). There is no action sequence where he would have ended up alive (unless he was already injured prior to the flame strike and the hp restored were to bring him up higher). Instantaneous damage is just that, instantaneous. So basically, even assuming he knew he'd want to do it, he either has to touch himself before the damage occurs (doing nothing if he's undamaged) or has to do so after he is dead (doing nothing if he's dead). But then it gets even weirder. What if he was holding "raise dead"? Could he touch himself and raise himself when he fell? He'd have to be dead for it to work, and if he were dead it would have discharged because he'd no longer be concentrating upon it. In terms of being able to touch himself without taking an action, it seems to fall under the lines of "attack of opportunity" or "quickened spell" usage, or even "drop to the floor" action. On the other hand: [B][/B] It seems that it requires a standard action to touch a friend, but that it is automatic. I'm not sure what that means for this conversation, other than that you couldn't miss the lich and then touch a friend in the same round...but you could if it was an attack of opportunity? I've confused myself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Releasing a (held) touch spell on yourself?
Top