Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7304647" data-attributes="member: 6919838">Otherwise, what? Lack of proof of A (mathematical or otherwise) is not proof of anything else and certainly not proof of !A.My arguments against the position, rather exclusive ones, are already here in this thread. But just because i may disagree with one position that doesnt mean i have to throw in with others arguments also against it that i might find equally wrong, just differently so.But the pythagorus reference was both a push back against the sense of wisdom of the mob that could be read into it AND also a more personal realization that any discussion on forums is not even remotely "everyone" in the subject as forums goers are a small and non-representative sample of the whole of the participants in any subject (it has seemed.)To me, emphasis on how many disagree is rather meaningless in this context and dangerous road to travel and when so many other ways to chalkenge are so obvious a generally wrong way to go about it.Ymmv.Sent from my [device_name] using <a href="http://EN World mobile app" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></blockquote>